By Boris Mellor
August 20 2010
Some Arsenal fans are perplexed at the club's slow progress in signing a new keeper; especially as Schwarzer and Given seems to be there for the asking. Others were also surprised to hear Stuart Robson say that Almunia is better than both of the above. It's a strange situation where a keeper is awarded the no1 spot yet the manager is involved in looking for a replacement at the same time.
Now I don't want to rain on anyone's parade here, I agree we need more input in the goal keeping department, but I do feel we have to look at the issue of a replacement seriously, using analysis rather than emotion. The kind of emotions Fabianski created with his performance at Porto.
I think Stuart Robson is an astute commentator, one of the best; could he be so wrong about Almunia? Why isn't Wenger in a rush to top £2 million for Schwarzer- if it is Wenger's decision?
For a top four team like Arsenal it is unusual not to have a keeper in the Premiership's top ten table. However, neither Almunia, Schwarzer or Given are in the top ten, but Cech and Van der Saar are.
When it comes to goals conceded per game Almunia at 1.19 is actually better than Schwarzer (1.24) or Given (1.2). Of course that can be an unfair comparison as goals conceded depend on the defence in front of you.
A better indicator is the ratio of shots on target conceded, for Almunia that is 3.59, i.e. he lets in a goal for less than every 4 shots on target. On this basis Schwarzer comes out best at 4.98, and Given at 4.64. It would appear that Schwarzer is the best shot stopper.
It should be kept in mind that Cech outdoes them all by only conceding .88 goals per game, but he isn't as good a shot stopper at 4.8 as Van Der Saar at 5.29, or even Schwarzer at 4.98.
Clean sheets
Manchester Utd kept 19 clean sheets (all keepers), Chelsea 18 ditto, Arsenal 14 ditto, Fulham 12 ditto and Man City 11 ditto. Clearly Man U and Chelsea have better organised defences and defenders than the other three. However it can hardly be argued that Given or Schwarzer would make such a difference to Arsenal that Van Der Saar or Cech might. It's quite incredible that the Gunners have more clean sheets than City or Fulham with a combination of Almunia, Fabianski and Mannone. Are we putting too much in store on the keeping position?
On the basis of the stats, and yes I know they are not everything, Schwarzer would be a slight improvement on Almunia, but Almunia has had a poor season, he could possibly get his form back, at 37 how long before Schwarzer goes into decline? At the best he would be an effective stop gap, not a world class keeper with a glittering career ahead of him.
Why would a club pay much more than £2 million for him? Lehmann was a far better buy at £1.5 million. I would rather we bought a world class keeper, but at the telephone number prices such a keeper would command we are not about to see that.
So what is Wenger up to? Who knows - but let's try a few possible scenarios.
- He gets Schwarzer at a fee he consider reasonable (i.e. cheap); as the Fulham Keeper is 37 he would soon step aside for one of Wenger's young prodigies.
- He fails to sign him, wrings his hands and says I tried my best, but meanwhile he has given Almunia a good kick up the backside.
- He ups his bid for Schwarzer and actually clinches the deal
- It's all a smoke screen and he is secretly completing a deal for a world class keeper.
Well I know which scenario I believe, but you are the punters, you pays your money and you takes your choice.
