By Boris Mellor
December 14 2009
No doubt about it for 45 minutes Liverpool played their best football of the season. They were fast slick and a goal ahead. It was also Liverpool's best line-up. Torres and Gerrard started, as I said in my match preview without these two Liverpool are a mediocrity.
Phil Thompson declared before the game that Arsenal are a two man team (Fabregas and RvP), well its better than being a no man team eh Phil? But in fact Arsenal, unable to field their best team, exposed Liverpool as not good enough.
As I have already written Liverpool dominated the first half, but a match is played over 90 minutes. At half-time I felt confident that Arsenal would get back into this game; one because they were only 1-0 down, and two Liverpool had put far more into the first half than the Gunners, and three I knew Wenger would give them a dressing down (I lied about the third). It meant that Arsenal were the fresher of the two teams after the interval.
Over the entire 90 minutes, Arsenal had more possession, won more tackles and had more shots on and off target. However there weren't a great number of shots in total for either team. Some Liverpool fans are ringing 606 as I write saying Arsenal had only one shot. They are dreaming, the stats show that the Gunners had seven shots to Liverpool's five. If Liverpool dominated the first half they weren't at the races for the second.
If Glen Johnson's own goal was a gift, so was the Kuyt goal that came about due to Almunia's flapping. Nonetheless the play that led to Arsenal's first goal came from slick passing that led to a brilliant cross from Nasri that caused mayhem in the Liverpool area.
The second goal was spectacular; Arshavin delivered a rocket into the top corner from a Fabregas pass. It's hard to describe in writing, but it was better than any of the four goals he scored at last year.
This was very different to last season's game, then Liverpool had over 20 shots, and Arsenal only five. The difference this time was that Vermaelen gave the defence a touch of steel. Every time Arsenal went ahead last year they would concede a few minutes later. Maybe Arsenal couldn't keep a clean sheet this time either, but they did keep a clean sheet for 45 minutes, and they kept it when it mattered.
Theo Criticism Unfair
There have been some mutterings about Theo in this game, but I believe they are wrong. In the first half everyone, apart from the back four, was rubbish, so why pick on him. In the second half he played a key role in both goals. For the first his presence caused Johnson to panic, the box was hardly full of Gunners, but at least Theo was there. For the second his challenge for Fabregas's cross meant that Liverpool's defence failed to clear the ball, hence it dropped to Arshavin for his moment of wizardry. He might not be the sorcerer but as an apprentice he gave the Russian good service.
Arsenal are the first team to go a goal down at Anfield and come back and win for six years. The last team to do that? You guessed right. Arsenal
Quote:Gooner_4_eva
I.e. the reverse - how to cut from centre to flank and back to centre to avoid man-marking and how to hold the ball up....
Surely, you are having a laugh about Theo holding the ball up? If you believe Theo has the stature, physique and skill to hold the ball up then you must be one be drinking the Theo coke. I have said this before and I will say it again. If Theo wasn't English, he will not be playing in the first team. Theo can run. No doubt about that. But this is football not Athletics. How many passes did Theo complete in the whole Pool game? He can't dribble, he can't head, he can't shoot, zero ball control, low pass completion rate, 7 goals in 4 years and you want him to play centre? Yeah right. We will win the treble this year with Theo scoring 35 goals...and pigs will fly.
Quote:Tom14
If he can dribble, how come he can't take on Aurelio?

