By Boris Mellor
August 27 2009
I couldn't see the Eduardo penalty incident, and unless you were behind the goal concerned I doubt if you did either. I was behind the goal at opposite end, so when Eduardo went down on 25 minutes I was not surprised to see the penalty awarded. Indeed the previously loud Celtic fan behind me did not raise a whisper in objection.
Most of the crowd, apart from the Celtic fans who were closer to the incident than most Arsenal fans, cheered the penalty decision and the resulting goal. The Celtic fans booed, but who wouldn't in their situation. So I still didn't suspect anything was wrong. I didn't know there was anything up, it was all quite ordinary. The Arsenal crowd chanted Eduardo's name in gratitude for ending the tedium.
The know-nothing at the Guardian blog claimed that the incident was not shown at half time as Arsenal were too embarrassed. Nonsense, the club never shows controversial decisions, and it doesn't matter which side suffers them. I have always assumed that was because the football authorities objected to them being shown.
I am surprised that he didn't write that even the heavens wept in sympathy with the bumble bees' cruel treatment by the fates, he missed his chance as it was raining.
So the first I knew that this great controversy was raging was a phone call from a friend fed up with ITVs haranguing of the evil, wicked and untalented Arsenal, well that's how she saw it. The theory that Arsenal had no right to win was a narrative I had observed first hand during the first leg Sky coverage. A constant diatribe of how poor Arsenal were, even though Celtic barely made a chance worth the name.
In the second half I was at the right end to see two perfectly good goals, the best by Eboue. "You've only come to see Eboue", sang the triumphant Gooners mob, a few, not that many Celtic fans slinked off home. I doubt if as many Gooners would have hung around for 5-0 down on aggregate. Arshavin was so impressed by Eboue's technique that he copied, and then improved it for his goal.
Meanwhile Arsenal were down to ten men for 3 minutes, so my headline is nonsense, but hey that's the media's role isn't it? Exaggerate everything.
Celtic saved their only spark of brilliance for the 181st minute, a great goal brought it back to 5-1, Arsenal fans joined in the applause for Donati's across goal volley. However it meant little, Celtic had been dominated over two matches, and if Arsenal had two lucky goals and a dodgy pen they still had far more chances than Celtic, who created hardly anything. With the best will in the world it could hardly be said they had been robbed, and the dignified Tony Mowbray was not prepared to claim he had been.
On returning home I watched the highlights and could clearly see it was not a penalty. If it was Eduardo's intention to dive then I really wish he hadn't. It wasn't necessary and it is not the Arsenal way, Wenger felt it was not a penalty, but he wasn't prepared to judge Eduardo. I suspect he will have a quiet word with him.Gazides' showed some nifty footwork today at the CL draw when door stepped on the issue. He talked about video and angles, and the need to support the referee. It was important that the referee was supported was a point he made again and again. Ha ha what a smoothy, Wenger could learn something there; we were all doubting our eyesight after that performance.
So the press raged and a Liverpool website rushed to proclaim Eduardo as the number one cheat with video evidence. No mention of how they had cheated Arsenal in the QF of the CL two years ago. A match that Arsenal had outplayed the scousers over two legs. I can't remember if the heavens wept, certainly players and fans wept internally, and a few openly. I do remember that the TV companies did not run a campaign for the cheat to be punished. No call for UEFA investigations and retrospective punishment.
However for any Liverpool fans, or media pundits, who are feeling morally superior, I suggest that they watch this video. They then can shut up, or at least broaden their campaign of vilification to include cheating Englishmen.
Quote:henrik1888
The problems are the following, pretty-much as you have outlined:
1. He gives the ball away a lot in positions that can be compromising. My brother can't stand him for this reason.
2. He tries to beat every player twice at least before moving on.
That sounds a bit harsh on a player who is improving, and he is still a youngster. If he can sort out certainly number 1 above, then he has the ability to be very special. He used to annoy me that he didn't turn games, but since 2nd half of last season, he has started to do things that at least send us on our way.
