By OxonRob
September 28 2005
It is difficult to comment positively on a one-sided game, but I find it just about possible to do so. London Irish lost the first half 0-38, but drew the second half 7-7. That is a stunning improvement. However, the reasons for it are not so obvious, and are subject to some guesswork.
On looking at the team sheets I commented that if we could hold them to 20 points we’d be doing well. There was evidently a great deal more experience in the Quins side. They fielded nine 1st XV squad players in their starting line up to our three. Perhaps significantly, six of them were forwards against one of ours. We fielded ten players under 21, and had six Academy triallists on show. Presumably they were therefore not used to playing together.
I shan’t do a complete report, but will reproduce my notes on things that struck me.
Some courageous but essentially individual defence and
attack throughout, but we played like a scratch team in the first half and paid
the price. Little teamwork in attack. Dreadful tackling, too. We looked like the
proverbial soft centred chocolate in the middle of the park, as the impressive
Quins back row and centres had a field day, doing what they wanted when they
wanted. How come this was possible with the two Fs in the Irish centre? Possibly
overwhelmed by sheer numbers? The second half was a different matter and our
defence was far better – although Quins took some pressure off the gas, and by
now had a lot of guys playing out of position.
Worth commenting on:- Quins
Worth commenting on:- London Irish
I am aware that there were an awful lot of changes to our original selection, caused by both new and unhealed injuries to selected players. Indeed I have the impression that there may have been a time when we did not think we could raise a team, let alone a smile! We thus ended up with a scratch side containing several people new to the colours. Presumably, there was also the need to keep others fresh for Sunday’s match against Wasps? (Bearing in mind the outstanding quality of such as Ojo and Geraghty, I do hope that they and their ilk, and perhaps the odd Argentinian, are available for selection and get selected.)
What seems obvious is that fielding a side with a considerably different specification of personnel does not do a lot for the less experienced or younger players in opposition - or indeed for the bemused spectator, who attends hoping to watch a good game of rugby. More seriously, such an experience might even destroy the confidence of otherwise potentially useful younger players.
However, there isn’t a lot you can do at the last minute with a big game at the weekend, and a shedload of injuries. It was one of those things, and those of us who enjoy the ‘A’ League games will doubtless fare better another day.