By Shane Thiele
April 10 2002
Sunday April 7 2002. A goal to Brisbane takes their lead to 102 points. I scramble for the calculator and curse the decaying batteries that have lay dormant since Year 12. A rough calculation indicates to me that it's going to be touch and go. Go Vossy, Go Leppa, Go Blacky......
|
Suddenly reality hits and I realise what a pathetic sight this
is. I'd become emotionally involved in a game of football not
involving my team purely for the fact that a thumping loss to the
Hawks will save us the indictment of bottom spot.
As I picked myself up from the fetal position the piercing sound
of the siren or more appropriately named - death knell sounded
.....we were officially bottom.
Last week I hinted that it would be a busy week on the message
boards if we lost, never for one moment envisaging the manner in
which such a result was to unfold. I spent the next 48 hours
mercilessly sledging everyone from the President to the Mascot and
regardless of not knowing what I was going to achieve it was if
nothing else, good therapy.
By Tuesday morning though I'd had a gutful of the critics. In
this case though I am not referring to the fans. We pay good money
and spend hours of our spare time in supporting this club and were
therefore most of the time speaking through the heart. Forgive us
this week for at times sounding irrational. We were hurting.
No, it's the media vultures who have predicted the demise of this
club every year for the last ten who are now relishing the chance to
be the first to say "I told you so". On Monday night Messer's
Sheehan, Healy & Walls spoke of doom and gloom off the field as well
as on. Granted some of it was correct, some of it was bloody obvious
and parts of it were blatant lies. The club has since officially
clarified the situation regarding the low turnout from the '81 & '82
Premiership sides and Robert's comments regarding the poor crowd
against Sydney were almost laughable. "Carlton v Sydney games at
Optus would regularly draw crowds of 35,000" Not surprisingly there
were no facts to prove as such.
The Age dragged out the standard piece regarding recruiting,
selectively choosing the mistakes that have been made over the past
5 or so years to highlight 'the crisis'. Without trying to defend
the mistakes it was clearly not a balanced piece of writing and
considering the article was referring to blunder's of the late 90's
why wasn't it written any time during the 2000 or 2001 seasons?
Funnily enough I remember a similar article in The Age from 1998
regarding the club which was along the same lines of "Too many
ageing stars, too slow, poor recruiting" and how the club had missed
a golden opportunity to trade the likes of Matthew Allan & Scott
Camporeale. I think all they did last Monday was change the name at
the top of the article.
Then there was of course the "Ex-players that went public calling
for the sacking of The President and claiming the coach will last
only another month". More disunity, turmoil and unrest, never
minding the fact that the comments came from just one player.
Bearing in mind also that it was a player who in the past has never
been shy in criticising the club. You have to wonder if there's an
emergency number for journalists to refer to when desperate for a
quote - '1800SwanMcKay'.
Tuesday night the Coach faced a media barrage resembling a West
Indian pace attack. Questions were fired like grenades but the Coach
wasn't ducking or weaving. He was honest, he was passionate and
unlike many of his colleagues, not once lost his cool. It had a
"bring it on" feel to it and by the end of it I was ready to run
through a brick wall. How could this not possibly inspire the
players?
One of the references was the old saying regarding actions
speaking louder than words. Yes, talk is cheap and there is still a
game of football to be played on Friday night. We've tried to remind
ourselves all week that after just two weeks so much can change. The
most commonly used analogies have been:
*Our two losses in 2002 were to the same teams we lost to in our
last Premiership year of 1995.
* In 2000 we were belted in Rounds 3,4 & 5 before winning the
next 13 in a row.
* In 1998 we were bottom half way through the season before
recovering to finish 11th and into a Grand Final the following year.
* Last season we were ordinary in the first two rounds before
overcoming the odds in 'that' win against Essendon.
Another that has sprung to mind for myself is a little less
obvious and takes us back to 1991.
I've often said that watching games like last week makes the good
times all the more sweeter. In all my years as a Carlton supporter I
have never left early nor reached for the remote. At 3/4 time last
week I made comment to Mrs Blueboy that the next thirty minutes of
my life, I will never get back awaiting the worst but with pen and
notebook still poised, ready to note any final positives. The Blues
failed to score and the page remained empty.
So what does that have to do with 1991? The weeks events has
reminded me of the aftermath of the infamous 1 goal disaster at the
Western Oval. I was shattered and embarrassed to show my face at
school for reasons other than braces and severe acne. The Blues
dominated the headlines but remained positive, vowing to give a more
committed effort against Collingwood the following week.
That day the Blues went on to turn words into actions and I
couldn't have been more proud. For prosperity reasons I purchased
the tape of that game and although not the most classic encounter,
each time I relive it I still remember how I felt on that cold,
dreary Saturday afternoon more than a decade later. There was not
enough talent in the team that took the field that day to merely
turn on such a performance. It came from the heart and pride in that
Navy Blue monogram.
Which finally brings me to Friday's game. Unlike 1991 there is
enough talent to overcome what is still an average Collingwood
outfit. Match-up's, key players and tactics will play a back seat to
dedication, pride and belief. If there is not significant
improvement in the latter than trying to preempt how the game will
unfold is irrelevant. In hindsight I need not have written one word
in the lead-up's to first two games. Could any of us predicted what
was to follow?!
You don't need me to tell you where and through who the
improvement needs to stem from. One thing that we should consider is
that as appalling as we have been in the middle and up forward, we
have conceded just thirty-one goals. Usually a team that has
received the publicity that Carlton has the last fortnight has had
cricket scores kicked against them.
On the other hand Collingwood has conceded forty-two goals
despite being competitive for all bar one quarter of the season. In
the Round 21 encounter last season Beaumont and Manton proved too
strong for Tarrant and Rocca so don't be surprised if they are given
first go. If fit David Gallagher will probably be the logical choice
for Brodie Holland with Anthony Franchina's spot in the side
possibly hinging on the medical report of the former.
Perhaps I'm tempting fate in using the word "logical" when
previewing this weeks battle. Deep down we all think the boys can
come to the party but after last week how many can say so with any
confidence? You sensed that Round 1 was treated as an aberration and
by merely turning up against Sydney it would all fall into place.
This week there will be no such illusions.
It's going to be an emotional night on Friday and one that for me
can't come soon enough. I jokingly used the phrase "Us against the
world" to an opposition supporter today and in all honesty at times
that's what it has felt like. We should probably take it as a
compliment that so many people take so much pleasure at seeing the
club in it's current plight. Well I hope they made the most of it
because it's not going to last!
Two weeks is enough and what better way to take out our
frustrations than on the old enemy. An enemy that over the past few
years has felt more comfortable than ourselves near the depths of
the ladder.
Carlton's history against Collingwood
Played 223, Won 116, Lost 103, Drawn 4
Longest winning sequence - 9 wins (1905-1909)
Highest score for - 28.12 - 180 (2000)
Lowest score against - 0.6 - 6 (1898)
Greatest winning margin - 111 points (2000), Greatest losing
margin - 102 points (1977)
Last time they met
Round 21 - MCG - 2001, Attendance 70,051
Carlton 20.10 - 130 d Collingwood 9.8 - 62
Key ball winners (All numbers possessions unless indicated)
Ratten - 30
Plunkett - 26
Whitnall - 25 (13 marks + 5 goals).
Buckley - 29
Burns - 20
Licuria - 18
|
« Round 3 12 April 2002
|
|
Old Dark
Navys.net
|
|
