Beancounting

By CoochieCoo
July 19 2021

Here are the finances of all 13 clubs in the Premier League. Some clubs were very late in filing due to Covid. This year also saw the windfall from CVC to each club.

Here are the figures from the published results of Clubs for the year ending 30 June 2019 (Season 2018-19)

The Key facts: 

• The CVC windfall was paid in this year and each club received £12.8m. Some clubs are bringing this in to profits over 4 years but Exeter, Worcester and Wasps have taken the full amount in the year. So I estimate that the results of 2019 have been boosted by £70.4m. The clubs have also re-valued their PRL shares upwards in line with the fair valuation formula, mostly by £7.382m.
• Results after taxation and interest amounted to a net profit of £50m. So all clubs made a profit except Harlequins and Saracens
• The Investment Analyst's preferred measure EBITDA (Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation) shows a net loss of £35m with Exeter the only club in profit. I have also excluded the revaluation credit of the PRL investments. The table is in the order of the best performing clubs in EBITDA terms.
• Harlequins still sustained a loss as they re-valued their PRL shares last year so the adjustment was not as great as other clubs.
• Saracens loss was due to the £7.7m incurred on their salary cap case in fines and legal costs.
• 1.88m fans attended premier rugby league matches over the season about 20k down from the season before.
• Total employed by the clubs was nearly 3,000 and players and team staff amounted to 911. This includes coaching and team support staff except, in Gloucester's case where coaching staff etc are in the sales and admin figure. Harlequins do not disclose the split of staff.
• Bath discloses that they spend £1m annually putting up and taking down their temporary structures. Bath pays approximately £312k to Bath Recreation Limited for use of the Rec.

Results in Graphs

The club with the greatest turnover, Wasps, makes the largest loss. The third highest turnover is Exeter and that gives them a profit mainly because of income from non rugby and lower overheads. Four clubs disclose they only have Rugby Income – Bath, Bristol, London Irish and Sale.

Here are the overheads with turnover. Where the green line is above the red means a profit and touching is breakeven and red well above green is not so good news. In our case we spend £1m on our temporary structures and this will be eliminated with a new stadium with extra capacity for revenue to realise Bruce's ambition for the club to be self sustaining.

Solvency

Clubs that require support from their owners/shareholders are Bath, Bristol, Newcastle, Saracens and Wasps. Saracens are in a much better place as Nigel Wray had written of £51m of loans last year.

All clubs except Worcester have filed their 2020 accounts and as soon as they have filed I will refresh the figures in what will be an interesting year with part of the season without any gates.

Rugby Clubs' Finances 2019 Pre Covid Season

Discussion started by Comeonmylovers.co.uk (IP Logged), 19/07/2021 09:15

Comeonmylovers.co.uk
19/07/2021 09:15

What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2021:07:27:11:41:25 by CoochieCoo.

Reply Quote Report

BathMatt53
19/07/2021 09:38

Thanks CC.

As an aside its always annoying that published accounts are so old! So much has changed since then even not accounting for COVID, such as salary cap reductions and pay reductions etc. It will be about 2025+ before we really see where the clubs are in terms of their finances - Bristol being the obvious one given that they were in the Champs that season?

Something fishy with the employee numbers surely - how can Newcastle have more employees than Bath, Tigers and Bristol put together?

[24/25 adoptee: Francois van Wyk]

Reply Quote Report

CoochieCoo
19/07/2021 12:06

The only accounts I am waiting for is Worcester for the 2020 figures. Will give more detail later.

Reply Quote Report

HappySaracen
19/07/2021 14:43

Nothing to add but that was an interesting read, thanks.

Reply Quote Report

hantssabre
19/07/2021 15:12

Presume the average gate for Bath is slightly inflated because of the Twickenham game as I didn’t think the Rec held as many as 18000?

Reply Quote Report

CoochieCoo
19/07/2021 17:06

Quote:

BathMatt53
Thanks CC.
As an aside its always annoying that published accounts are so old! So much has changed since then even not accounting for COVID, such as salary cap reductions and pay reductions etc. It will be about 2025+ before we really see where the clubs are in terms of their finances - Bristol being the obvious one given that they were in the Champs that season?

Something fishy with the employee numbers surely - how can Newcastle have more employees than Bath, Tigers and Bristol put together?

Ok back from Lacock guide duties so here goes

Why the 2019 figures were so late is Worcester and Saracens were late on filing. Saracens by 11 months and Worcester by 12 months. Worcester is a month overdue on their 2020 accounts.

Bristol accounts for 2020 will cover their 2019/20 season so we will have to wait for their league topping season of 2020/21.

Most accounts need to be filed by June 2022 for this last season so hopefully come next summer I can update where we are then.

Newcastle has 290 bar and catering staff as they have 1.7m income from conferences etc.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2021:07:19:17:08:44 by CoochieCoo.

Reply Quote Report

CoochieCoo
19/07/2021 17:10

Quote:

hantssabre
Presume the average gate for Bath is slightly inflated because of the Twickenham game as I didn’t think the Rec held as many as 18000?

Yes as also with Sarries and Quins who had big games at Wembley and HQ I believe.

Reply Quote Report

Goto: Forum List•Message List•Search• Log In

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net