Saints V Bath 10th March - Teams Up

By Saint Ted
March 9 2023

This is the Northampton Saints v Bath Rugby match thread

Who: Northampton Saints v Bath Rugby

Where: Franklins Gardens

When: Friday 10th March; 19:45

How do I watch: BT Sport

Tickets: Direct from Saints

Matchday Info: Guide to the gardens

Saints take: Saints O'ffy

Officials:

Referee: Jack Makepeace
Assistant referees: Harry Walbaum and Wayne Falla
No.4: Darryl Chapman
TMO: Rowan Kitt

Teams:

Northampton Saints   Bath
James Ramm 15 Tom de Glanville
Tom Collins 14 Gabriel Hamer-Webb
Matt Proctor 13 onathan Joseph
Fraser Dingwall © 12 Max Ojomoh
Tommy Freeman 11 Matt Gallagher
Fin Smith 10 Orlando Bailey
Tom James 9 Louis Schreuder
     
Alex Waller 1 Beno Obano
Robbie Smith 2 Tom Dunn ©
Paul Hill 3 D’Arcy Rae
Lukhan Salakaia-Loto 4 Dave Attwood
Alex Moon 5 GJ van Velze
Angus Scott-Young 6 Josh Bayliss
Sam Graham 7 Chris Cloete
Juarno Augustus 8 Miles Reid 
     
Replacements:    
Tom Cruse 16 Tom Doughty
Ethan Waller 17 Juan Schoeman
Alfie Petch 18 Johannes Jonker
Brandon Nansen 19 Josh McNally
Sam Matavesi 20 Will Spencer
Callum Braley 21 Ben Spencer
James Grayson 22 Will Butt
Rory Hutchinson 23 Richard de Carpentier

 

Not considered for selection:
Alex Coles, George Furbank, Mike Haywood, Emmanuel Iyogun, Courtney Lawes, Ollie Sleightholme and Karl Wilkins.

International Duty:
Lewis Ludlam, Alex Mitchell and David Ribbans (all England).

Bookmark or share this story with:

Saints V Bath 10th March - Teams Up
Discussion started by Marching On , 09/03/2023 12:04
Marching On
09/03/2023 12:04
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:16:08:44:28 by Saint Ted.

twsaint
09/03/2023 12:26
Much better.

Bath have a huge number out.

ajack
09/03/2023 14:42
Two hookers on the bench is unusual.

Saintly Pursuit
09/03/2023 14:49
Matavesi is probably covering the back row

Dave Jackson
09/03/2023 14:52
Aaron hinckley not even on bench.

St Stokey.
09/03/2023 14:58
This 'Not considered of selection' is a funny old section. What does it even mean?

Saint Ted
09/03/2023 15:02
Not considered for selection means that the player can’t be selected. So either injured and unable to play or suspended.

Francis Allen
09/03/2023 15:08
Quote:
twsaint
Much better.
Bath have a huge number out.

That's true, 5 big names crocked last Saturday at Welford Road, some others missing so strength of squad under real pressure for this one.

Awaywin
09/03/2023 15:14
Quite interesting that Bath don't list the injured players or those on international duty. Will have to keep an eye out on other clubs to see what they do.

St Stokey.
09/03/2023 15:26
Quote:
Saint Ted
Not considered for selection means that the player can’t be selected. So either injured and unable to play or suspended.

So its more like 'Not available for selection'? Not considered, for me, would be the players that are available but not selected, ie. Hinkley

LeicesterSaint
09/03/2023 16:34
It is strange terminology I suppose - surely all first team players who aren't injured or away on international are 'considered' for selection every week? Hinckley is a strange one - he's played a fair amount but not every minute of every game so he'd need a rest week. Perhaps illness or something personal but surely that would then put him on the aforementioned list?

Matevesi is a pretty strong option to cover flanker but surely not ahead of an out and out flanker who has been in good form?

Statesman
09/03/2023 16:45
Good form? He was absolutely dreadful in his 2 cameos against Glaws and Bears.

My guess - He was considered and then dropped and replaced by a hooker. Wouldn't be surprised if we don't see him again. A shadow of the player we saw at the end of last season.

Rutland Saint
09/03/2023 16:55
Thankfully didn’t see the Bristol debacle but, that seems a harsh analysis of Hinckley and I hope we see him many times over the forthcoming seasons

Londonsaint
09/03/2023 17:12
Can pick a pretty handy Bath XV of players missing:
15. McConnochie
14. Cokanasiga
13. Lawrence
12. Redpath
11. Muir
10. Francis
9.
8. Barbeary, Coetzee
7. Underhill
6. Hill
5. Roux
4. Ewels
3. Stuart
2.
1. Boyce, Morozov

BerniesBestFriend
09/03/2023 17:44
All were poor last week v Bristol however Hinckley comes imto my mind at the same time as chicken and no head 🙄

twsaint
09/03/2023 18:07
Quote:
Statesman

Wouldn't be surprised if we don't see him again. .

Too many folks on here on here seem happy to say things like this.

He's got the wrong side of some decisions at the end of games. He's trying too hard in the few minutes he's got on the field. It looks a sensible move to make, but he has much to offer in the future.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:09:20:13:21 by twsaint.

Francis Allen
09/03/2023 19:39
Quote:
Londonsaint
Can pick a pretty handy Bath XV of players missing:
15. McConnochie
14. Cokanasiga
13. Lawrence
12. Redpath
11. Muir
10. Francis
9.
8. Barbeary, Coetzee
7. Underhill


It is what it is though, got physically battered by Leicester (fairly) last week to add to our injury woes. It's going to be difficult, I like the look of your backs so fear my trip to the Gardens tomorrow is going to be a hard watch. Wishing now that I had bought a ticket for the England under 20 match at the Rec tomorrow ! Still, always enjoy a visit to the Gardens despite having to pay for a hotel as no late train. An annoying consequence of Friday night games for away fans.
6. Hill
5. Roux
4. Ewels
3. Stuart
2.
1. Boyce, Morozov

Statesman
09/03/2023 20:05
Quote:
twsaint
Quote:
Statesman

Wouldn't be surprised if we don't see him again. .

To many folks on here on here seem happy to say things like this.

He's got the wrong side of some decisions at the end of games. He's trying too hard in the few minutes he's got on the field. It looks a sensible move to make, but he has much to offer in the future.

That’s the 2nd time in 2 days that you’ve tried to police what posters say on a thread. Are you posting in an official capacity? If not, then please don’t try to tell me what I shouldn’t be posting. If you are, then please amend the rules at the top of the Board to reflect your recent interventions.

For the record, I was very impressed with Hinckley when he joined at the back end of last season. I was pleased that he was offered a contract and I think he’s the best jackyler in the club, an area were we are very poor. I have been surprised by the limited game time that he has been given this season. His bench appearances against Glaws and Bears were dreadful and he has now been dropped and replaced by a player playing out of position and who was also terrible against Bears. All of that leads me to conclude that the coaches don’t rate him and will be reluctant to renew what I guess was a 1 year contract. On that basis, it’s not a massive stretch to opine that he might have played his last game for the club.

Saint Ted
09/03/2023 20:16
In fairness TWS isn’t doing any policing, he’s pointing something out, an observation. I also agree with what was said in a thread about a new signing yet again being turned into ‘why haven’t we signed a prop’, until the point we sign a prop, then it will be ‘why did we sign the wrong prop’

Statesman
09/03/2023 22:39
Quote:
Saint Ted
In fairness TWS isn’t doing any policing, he’s pointing something out, an observation.’

Let’s be clear. It’s an observation with an inference. Still, now I know the rules, happy to play by them.

JCDL86
09/03/2023 23:14
Quote:
Statesman
For the record, I was very impressed with Hinckley when he joined at the back end of last season. I was pleased that he was offered a contract and I think he’s the best jackyler in the club, an area were we are very poor. I have been surprised by the limited game time that he has been given this season. His bench appearances against Glaws and Bears were dreadful and he has now been dropped and replaced by a player playing out of position and who was also terrible against Bears. All of that leads me to conclude that the coaches don’t rate him and will be reluctant to renew what I guess was a 1 year contract. On that basis, it’s not a massive stretch to opine that he might have played his last game for the club.

I would've thought his form at the end of last season could've resulted in a 2-3 year contract, so I'd be surprised if it's only a 1-year deal. Guess we'll find out when the INs and OUTs are known in a few months. Sometimes players get knocks/dead legs in training - if they're 50/50, they could be rested and not classified as injured. He's had relatively few opportunities this season but hasn't been bad prior to the last couple of games. I was disappointed in his appearance against Glaws - 2 penalties inside 90s gave them field position for their final try. Even if that (and the Bristol match, not that anyone came away from that with credit!) were a factor in him being 'dropped', I'd be surprised if he's out of contract and won't feature again.

NGSB
10/03/2023 08:02
.young player, give him a break, it’s a hard gig.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:10:11:25:17 by NGSB.

Saint Ted
10/03/2023 08:11
He has alopecia.

BBC interview



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:10:08:14:15 by Saint Ted.

connordavies95
10/03/2023 09:27
I thought the Hinkley decision was odd on first reading but can kind of see the thinking. Matavasi is in need of game time and covers back row, we're already missing a few bodies in that area with Lawes, Coles and Wilkins already injured so kind of means we've got a Flanker spare in case of one ASY, Graham, Trokkie or Ludlam go down this injured for Saints or England.

LeicesterSaint
10/03/2023 09:42
Sometimes it isn't the point but the way it is made - it comes across as incredibly callous when we opine about players being dropped/binned/let go after a bad/indifferent game or two. Doesn't mean you can't post it but don't be surprised when others get a little protective of players. In Hinckley's case he's still relatively young, still settling in and in a position where he's expected to make a difference defensively which is very difficult when you're getting knocked backwards all the time. For all the plaudits the jackallers get they can only do so because their team mates are giving them that opportunity - for England currently see Ludlam doing loads of graft and chop tackles so others can get over the ball.

Statesman
10/03/2023 10:34
Quote:
LeicesterSaint
Sometimes it isn't the point but the way it is made - it comes across as incredibly callous when we opine about players being dropped/binned/let go after a bad/indifferent game or two. Doesn't mean you can't post it but don't be surprised when others get a little protective of players. In Hinckley's case he's still relatively young, still settling in and in a position where he's expected to make a difference defensively which is very difficult when you're getting knocked backwards all the time. For all the plaudits the jackallers get they can only do so because their team mates are giving them that opportunity - for England currently see Ludlam doing loads of graft and chop tackles so others can get over the ball.

It's a forum to exchange views and thoughts. We all have different styles of communicating. As long as contributions don't break the rules we should accept this. I might find your style dull and uninteresting but I wouldn't point that out and I wouldn't try to deny you a voice.

Saint Maul
10/03/2023 11:59
This is a must win game if we have top 4 ambitions.

On paper we should win. But then on paper we shouldn’t ship 62 points to Bristol.

Hopefully the good Saints show up. Which we tend to do more when we play at home.

COYS!!!

Saintfanh
10/03/2023 12:16
Quote:
LeicesterSaint
Sometimes it isn't the point but the way it is made - it comes across as incredibly callous when we opine about players being dropped/binned/let go after a bad/indifferent game or two. Doesn't mean you can't post it but don't be surprised when others get a little protective of players. In Hinckley's case he's still relatively young, still settling in and in a position where he's expected to make a difference defensively which is very difficult when you're getting knocked backwards all the time. For all the plaudits the jackallers get they can only do so because their team mates are giving them that opportunity - for England currently see Ludlam doing loads of graft and chop tackles so others can get over the ball.

+

St Stokey.
10/03/2023 12:17
My view is that Hinkley has all the potential to be a wonderful player. I think he's just having an off period and will be back in the side soon.

The problem with coming off the bench is that there is the tendancy to make an impression is a limited amount of time. As we've seen a number of times, trying too hard can almost be as bad as no trying hard enough.

He'll be back and we'll be glad of him.

Saintfanh
10/03/2023 12:27
Great to see Ramm, Freeman, Proctor and Augustus back - should give us more defensive and aerial solidity and strength and danger in attack. (Not downplaying Hutch though has been so much better in defence this year).

Fingers crossed Smith and Grayson will push each other on in some key games.

As others say this is a must win.

LeicesterSaint
10/03/2023 14:13
Sigh, nobody is trying to deny your your voice Statesman, just using their own to express their own views. Up to you whether you take it on board but these are human beings and careers we're talking about - not subbuteo mannequins

Statesman
10/03/2023 14:31
Quote:
LeicesterSaint
Sigh, nobody is trying to deny your your voice Statesman, just using their own to express their own views. Up to you whether you take it on board but these are human beings and careers we're talking about - not subbuteo mannequins

Don't patronise me. Perfectly happy to discuss views in the way that Stokey, NGSB, Connor and JCDL have above. But I won't tolerate that stuff from TWS and if you want to describe my views as callous then don't be surprised when I describe yours as dull and uninteresting.

Deesaint
10/03/2023 14:41
Quote:
St Stokey.
My view is that Hinkley has all the potential to be a wonderful player. I think he's just having an off period and will be back in the side soon.
The problem with coming off the bench is that there is the tendancy to make an impression is a limited amount of time. As we've seen a number of times, trying too hard can almost be as bad as no trying hard enough.

He'll be back and we'll be glad of him.

+1

He gives our backrow greater balance
The 5/10 minute at the end of a game shouldn’t be the measurement of him
If anything he is trying his hardest but just a bit too much

St Stokey.
10/03/2023 15:23
I think the form of the team has also had an affect.

When he joined us at the back end of last season, we had some incredible games, like the one against Quins where we were in a great run of form in some huge games. He was so good that his game against he pretty much earned his contract then and there.

I think its a little unfair to base Hinkley's ability on the appalling team display against Bears and the last 15 minutes of the Gloucester game where we'd pretty much switched off. Put him in a game where the rest of the team plays well and I think you'll see a completely different player.

LeicesterSaint
10/03/2023 15:56
You don't see any irony in that at all then? Some posts/posters are fine but you 'won't tolerate' others? Apologies if that's patronising.

I'm very happy for you to think my responses are dull - I'd much rather that than offensive about our own players!

I'm off to tweet that Lineker should be sacked but Clarkson shouldn't be cancelled.

twsaint
10/03/2023 16:04
It’s hard to know what to say in response to a comment like that about me.

Statesman
10/03/2023 16:11
Quote:
LeicesterSaint
You don't see any irony in that at all then? Some posts/posters are fine but you 'won't tolerate' others? Apologies if that's patronising.
I'm very happy for you to think my responses are dull - I'd much rather that than offensive about our own players!

I'm off to tweet that Lineker should be sacked but Clarkson shouldn't be cancelled.

I'll let you have the last word LS - let's move on.
Looking forward to a good win tonight so that I can be effusive in my praise of the Saintsmen!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:10:16:13:32 by Statesman.

JohnI
10/03/2023 19:56
Oh here we go!!!! Atrocious tackling and defence. Where we left off last week. 😡😡😡

herbie85
10/03/2023 20:03
Not just because he scored, but Robbie Smith seems to be improving game on game. Looked a bit shaky when he first came but probably think he's our first choice hooker when all fit now. Carries well.

JohnI
10/03/2023 20:12
We really do have the worst defence in the league and teams know it so they just keep on hammering at the door and it breaks.

NGSB
10/03/2023 20:13
Reassuring to see that the smoke from the fireworks is as irritating on tv as it is at the ground !

Berkshire-Saint
10/03/2023 20:17
No answer to the bath maul at the minute just going backwards

herbie85
10/03/2023 20:23
Agree our defence is easy to play against. Phase rugby will succeed, don't need anything flash, just put together a good 6 or 7 phases and opposition will get joy. Albeit we got the pen, that last scrum worried me

Berkshire-Saint
10/03/2023 20:33
Nice to see that they managed to hold them out before half time and go in with a lead. I think Robbie Smith is having a very good game.

TunbridgeSaint
10/03/2023 20:35
Robbie smith is very good, and strong darts compared to last week. Augustus makes such a difference and Ramm immense under high ball.
Certainly not a classic so far and feels like we are playing in baths hands a little bit, need some more territory and put some phases together and there should be a few more tries out there for us

Matthew
10/03/2023 20:43
Quote:
NGSB
Reassuring to see that the smoke from the fireworks is as irritating on tv as it is at the ground !

I really like the fireworks! Probably more impressive than most of our play in that first half too!

Berkshire-Saint
10/03/2023 20:55
This is where good teams kick on, kept out bath before the half, came out and scored first, need to kick on and utilise the momentum



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:10:20:56:08 by Berkshire-Saint.

herbie85
10/03/2023 21:06
Goes without saying but we are a much better side with Augustus. I know there are rumours he will be off, is it a done deal?

Berkshire-Saint
10/03/2023 21:11
Quote:
herbie85
Goes without saying but we are a much better side with Augustus. I know there are rumours he will be off, is it a done deal?

Agreed, ties up players creating space elsewhere. Hopefully he stays a bit longer

Berkshire-Saint
10/03/2023 21:15
That is disappointing, instead of closing that door, given Bath hope at a crucial time. It’s that ruthless ability to kill a game that we haven’t had for a long time.

Deesaint
10/03/2023 21:25
Great fight back after week

Berkshire-Saint
10/03/2023 21:33
Needed the 5 points and delivered.
Much deserved MoM for Smith.
Still shipping a shed load of points and so many questions over the defence.
You can only play what’s in front of you but will be tougher tests ahead.

AlexC
10/03/2023 21:39
Good enough win for the 5 points. Ah defence defence defence, we know it’s an issue but right now not able to resolve that one. Great to see Robbie Smith take MotM, looking like somebody on the up. Another solid game from Collins also.

TunbridgeSaint
10/03/2023 21:48
Job done and 5 points in the bank. 3 tries conceded from driving mauls, a weakness we’ve had for a long time and one I don’t think we’re able to fix with the current roster of the squad, just a plain size issue.
Actually thought the overall defence was good today and some solid tackles and competitive at the breakdown.
Quite astounding that if we don’t make the top 4, our season will be over by end of April and next season doesn’t start until end of October, that’s a long break with no saints action. Fingers crossed that isn’t the case!
On a tangent, I think Josh Bayliss would be a great replacement if Lawes does leave, unreal pace for a back row and would suit our game well

herbie85
10/03/2023 22:05
Good win, tougher challenges ahead. For once, one of my earlier posts ages well, Robbie Smith on an upward curve now settled, juarno very good other than one knock on. Nice to hear Dowson not entirely happy with defence and highlighted maul defence, hopefully let's see some of that rectified next week which will have a huge bearing on where we finish.

Olneybutchers
10/03/2023 22:22
Solid win. Great back row. Get Lewis and Courtney back we will be there trouble away semi at Sale.


Well done the fans tonight. Loud and proud.



Excellent Saul’s scratchings.

Harpole Saint
10/03/2023 22:33
There were some blokes in d terrace sing the “oh Jonny bairstow” song but with it “oh Tommy freemo” I think. More new songs please, I’ve been racking my brain for months but afraid I’m not gifted in the music department. We need more new songs, lift the place up shake it about! I make pizza and will happily bring one for the best new song at the end of season game?

Matthew
10/03/2023 22:47
Very pleased with that second half albeit against a pretty poor Bath outfit. As noted elsewhere, defence seemed OK excepting being unable to stop their maul. Given that we know we can't stop a driving maul from 5m out, would it be so ridiculous for us to attack the lineout rather than trying to stop something we can't? Scored six tries and probably left at least half as many again out there, one of which in the first few seconds.

Slightly disappointed we didn't play for another score at the end - I have a nasty feeling our points difference will cost us a league position in the final reckoning. Though perhaps it's irretrievably bad compared to our competitors for the playoffs with the small number of games remaining.

Saint Maul
10/03/2023 22:48
6 try win. We’ve got a hooker who can hit his jumpers. Some lovely creation and use of space. So some positives.

But still a woeful defence that concedes 4 tries at home to the bottom team suffering from a raft of injuries.

St Marcus
11/03/2023 00:01
Quote:
Olneybutchers
Solid win. Great back row. Get Lewis and Courtney back we will be there trouble away semi at Sale.

Well done the fans tonight. Loud and proud.



Excellent Saul’s scratchings.

C block on decent form tonight and singing sounded pretty good with less clapping along to wendy due to the cold (please don't clap if you're not going to also sing, you just compete with those of us who actually bother to sing and muffle the singing). Also agree with Harpole - be good to hear some more songs, surely Rambo, Freemo and TC could be a good subject!

On the rugby, 2nd half was much better than the first. Thought Fin had a great game today, really impressive kicking and some good hits in defence. Again there is plenty to work on (poor maul defence in particular) but another step closer to a semi. Congrats also to Dingers, Freemo, and TC on the milestones. COYS

FommyTreeman
11/03/2023 09:06
A word on Alex Moon - immense. The “now or never” brigade had marked his card and I think he showed a brilliant all round game last night. Powerful carries, solid tackles and got on the end of Smith’s darts well. Ribbans will leave a hole but we’ll be ok. Lukhan - excellent as always. Let’s hope Temo can push competition next season.

Statesman
11/03/2023 09:19
Not a great game but a win nevertheless, albeit against a very poor side.

Augustus makes a huge difference when he plays. Lineout looks more reliable when Robbie Smith plays and his all round game is good - now 1st choice for me.

Fin Smith is going to develop into a top top player who will be away with England a lot. But with Furbank/Grayson as back up I think we’re in good shape at 10.

So much still to work on for Dowson/Vesty - need to sort maul defence before we play LI.

stjj
11/03/2023 09:29
“twsaint
It’s hard to know what to say in response to a comment like that about me”

Indeed. Over the years there have been many regular posters who think only their views are valid. Please don’t give up posting.

Statesman
11/03/2023 09:44
Quote:
stjj
“twsaint
It’s hard to know what to say in response to a comment like that about me”

Indeed. Over the years there have been many regular posters who think only their views are valid. Please don’t give up posting.

Says the poster who a few days ago demanded that the entire coaching team be sacked!

Walks11
11/03/2023 09:59
All getting a bit tetchy isn’t it!.. due to my BT Sport boycott only had the pleasure of ‘you know’ Lennie and Graham on BBC, didn’t sound a great game generally and we made hard work of what should have been an easier win. Big plus for me and something that’s not been right for a long time is we finally converted some 5M attacking lineouts. Hopefully a sign of more consistency in that area, makes a big difference to our game if we can maul as it also opens other attacking moves off the line out as per Juarno try. Lots still to improve elsewhere though

ajack
11/03/2023 10:09
Quote:
TunbridgeSaint
Job done and 5 points in the bank. 3 tries conceded from driving mauls, a weakness we’ve had for a long time and one I don’t think we’re able to fix with the current roster of the squad, just a plain size issue.

But yet we managed to score four tries through the forwards ourselves included five metre mauls, surely if it is just a size issue that wouldn't be possible?

It is extremely difficult to defend a five metre maul when it is done well. We might not be the best and there is certainly room for improvement however no reason at all that improvement is not possible with the current squad. Pretty much like every other part of our defence.

stjj
11/03/2023 10:16
Statesman
You just proved my point. Thank you.

stjj
11/03/2023 10:24
Statesman
Are you referring to this?
“I would also hope Darbon is earning his large pay cheque by calling in the whole coaching team explaining to them that they have until the end of the season to show they can do the job otherwise go elsewhere - contract or no contract “

Who’s going to call Darbon in? Where does the buck stop?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2023:03:11:10:51:08 by stjj.

Saint Ted
11/03/2023 10:47
This needs to stop.

Statesman, you can’t start calling out and insulting other posters because someone gave an opinion that was different to yours. How you’ve come to the conclusion that people are telling you what you can and can’t say is beyond me and it would appear beyond others as well.

stjj
11/03/2023 10:52
Saint Ted
Thank you.

stjj
11/03/2023 11:07
NGSB
I’m sure I read somewhere recently that Saints are trying to improve air quality around the Gardens….😉

Duckonstilts
11/03/2023 11:18
I can understand you have a disagreement but do we all need to read it while trying to discuss an important win for our end of season ambitions? Not sure it has anything to do with this topic.

I am happy for you to voice and defend your opinions btw , its healthy.... but its not really relevant

Statesman
11/03/2023 11:18
Quote:
Saint Ted
This needs to stop.
Statesman, you can’t start calling out and insulting other posters because someone gave an opinion that was different to yours. How you’ve come to the conclusion that people are telling you what you can and can’t say is beyond me and it would appear beyond others as well.

Read the thread. It's not about opinions - it's about posters trying to close down other posters when they don't like what is being said. That's exactly what twsaint was doing - the inference was that my post was unacceptable on here - fine with that if it broke the rules - but it didn't even come close to breaking the rules. We then had LS opining that my comments were callous - that's a strong statement so don't be surprised when I respond in kind. I then closed the issue down last night only for stjj to reopen it this morning - in what way was that post relevant to last night's game which is what this thread is supposed to be about? I didn't start any of this - I made a relatively innocuous post about one of our players that seems to have a prompted a reaction from some of our more sensitive posters.

Longers
11/03/2023 11:19
Meanwhile -

I was pleased to see Robbie Smith back, and playing so well that Ben Kay had to give MOM to a forward!
I thought Alex Moon had one of his best games for us. He really has moved forward this season. Good for him.
I thought our tackling was much improved. I know we were out of position too often in pure "defence" terms, but the tackling itself was much more dynamic and attacking.
A couple of issues that puzzled me -
We had scored two tries already from rolling mauls/lineouts. So we kick three points rather than go for a third try. I gained the impression from the TV that it was an off-pitch decision with the kicking tee sent on with a water-boy?
We could not challenge the Bath rolling maul effectively and yet we only tried to sack it once - and got penalised, but at least we tried - and did not compete on the jump at all.

But we got back to winning ways. We got five points. We did not slip up.

Saint Ted
11/03/2023 11:25
Quote:
Statesman
Quote:
Saint Ted
This needs to stop.
Statesman, you can’t start calling out and insulting other posters because someone gave an opinion that was different to yours. How you’ve come to the conclusion that people are telling you what you can and can’t say is beyond me and it would appear beyond others as well.

Read the thread. It's not about opinions - it's about posters trying to close down other posters when they don't like what is being said. That's exactly what twsaint was doing - the inference was that my post was unacceptable on here - fine with that if it broke the rules - but it didn't even come close to breaking the rules. We then had LS opining that my comments were callous - that's a strong statement so don't be surprised when I respond in kind. I then closed the issue down last night only for stjj to reopen it this morning - in what way was that post relevant to last night's game which is what this thread is supposed to be about? I didn't start any of this - I made a relatively innocuous post about one of our players that seems to have a prompted a reaction from some of our more sensitive posters.

You are the only person that has come to that conclusion, nobody has tried to shut you down, you’ve chosen to take it that way.

This isn’t a discussion point. It ends now.

SaintsDuncan
11/03/2023 12:12
Quote:
Longers
Meanwhile -
We could not challenge the Bath rolling maul effectively and yet we only tried to sack it once - and got penalised, but at least we tried - and did not compete on the jump at all. .

I'm pretty sure there was another occasion where we successfully sacked it, ref called it a a tackle.

I do wonder if the Bath coaching team saw their greatest chance of gaining anything from this match as the maul and therfore had spent all week focusing on it.

Also, perhaps one for Super-Stat St Ted, it might be interesting to study the success rate of mauls (both sides of the ball) to see how "easy" They are to defend legally. My gut feel is that if it's set halfway decently the team in possession will make very good yardage

Sans Culottes
11/03/2023 12:27
Quote:
Longers
Meanwhile -
I was pleased to see Robbie Smith back, and playing so well that Ben Kay had to give MOM to a forward!
I thought Alex Moon had one of his best games for us. He really has moved forward this season. Good for him.
I thought our tackling was much improved. I know we were out of position too often in pure "defence" terms, but the tackling itself was much more dynamic and attacking.
A couple of issues that puzzled me -
We had scored two tries already from rolling mauls/lineouts. So we kick three points rather than go for a third try. I gained the impression from the TV that it was an off-pitch decision with the kicking tee sent on with a water-boy?
We could not challenge the Bath rolling maul effectively and yet we only tried to sack it once - and got penalised, but at least we tried - and did not compete on the jump at all.

But we got back to winning ways. We got five points. We did not slip up.

That was shortly before half time, and I suspect that the logic was , bank the three and go in in the lead, rather than possibly fail in the lineout, and give Bath the morale boost from successfully keeping us out, and thus going in on a high.

For what it’s worth, which is little, the unanimous call from our area of the stands was to take the three.

Saint Ted
11/03/2023 12:28
We have a success rate of 92% with our mauls, opposition comes in at 91% so we’re out mauling the opposition by the smallest of margins.

Deesaint
11/03/2023 15:20
I thought it was a good solid performance throughout
I will stay clear of mentioning individual players as in my opinion that is how they should perform and have rightly taken comment for previous lacklustre performances

Coaches have taken a bashing of late but you have to give them credit for the application and attitude last night
Million miles away from last week

But again that is what we should be seeing not some of the limp performances we have witnessed

Now just need to build on it and move forward

One worry
There where a lot of empty seats

SaintsAsh
11/03/2023 15:46
Quote:
Deesaint
One worry
There where a lot of empty seats

I think that it was a Friday night and the weather had been terribad all day, also playing a bottom team. That is the optimum conditions for empty seats.

SaintsDuncan
11/03/2023 16:37
Difficult for away fans too

Francis Allen
11/03/2023 21:16
Quote:
SaintsDuncan
Difficult for away fans too

Indeed, we Bath fans do travel in numbers to away games but Friday ones really are a challenge. I decided against driving up and back the same day and chose to stay in hotel so an added cost. These days I prefer the train but impossible to get back from Northampton after the game.

Deesaint
12/03/2023 10:35
As a side note
I see that Piers Francis was unavailable due to concussion
How many times ?

Longers
12/03/2023 11:25
Quote:
Deesaint
As a side note
I see that Piers Francis was unavailable due to concussion
How many times ?

I spotted that as well.

I worried when he was with us. I just hope he doesn't do himself permanent or delayed harm.

Walks11
12/03/2023 11:53
Quote:
Longers
Quote:
Deesaint
As a side note
I see that Piers Francis was unavailable due to concussion
How many times ?

I spotted that as well.

I worried when he was with us. I just hope he doesn't do himself permanent or delayed harm.

Not assured by any means but you would hope in this day and age and being at an elite level club he’s getting expert advice on recurring injuries, long term welfare and risk assessed as to whether to continue playing

riverlodge
13/03/2023 12:14
Quote:
Harpole Saint
There were some blokes in d terrace sing the “oh Jonny bairstow” song but with it “oh Tommy freemo” I think. More new songs please, I’ve been racking my brain for months but afraid I’m not gifted in the music department. We need more new songs, lift the place up shake it about! I make pizza and will happily bring one for the best new song at the end of season game?
Really enjoyed my Friday eve at FG back on D block, and that song was def an amusing part - well done the bloke just behind us that kicked that song off and got a few of us going on it!

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net