The Good & The Bad: Quins v Wasps


By Battering Ram Winger
December 29 2009

So, another Grand Day Out, no Wensleydale. Or victory. FWIW... THE GOOD

1). Strettle's Try

Looks like he's back on form going forwards, anyway!

2). Robshaw

He's like an Energiser Bunny, he never stops

3). Good use of the subs bench

To fix problems.

THE BAD

1). The Match

Garbage as a spectacle barring a couple of brief flashes from either team. Set piece disasters all round for both teams, missed tackles, misplaced passes, the woeful kicking out of hand and off the tee, dropped balls, the guy in front of us turned round at the end and said he had more fun listening to the comments of despair emanating from me, my aunt and her husband (Wasps fans) than he did from the match.

2). Simpson's Injury

Looked self-inflicted as he went at Care, but no one likes seeing the oxygen come out. Percival one handedly tossing him aside can't have helped either. Mind you, Simpson got a bit of a schooling at the back fo the ruck and some of his passing was atrocious (as was Care's).

3). The Big Game

Not my seat at the Stoop. Another home advantage squandered in the name of marketing. All those people not giving a damn about the (admittedly poor) spectacle and amusing themselves with Mexican waves. The smoke from the fireworks obscuring half the pitch. The farce with the bird and the match ball. The X Factor karaoke massacres (the chap with the afro had a set of lungs on him given his size, I'll give him that). The terrible, horrid food (barring the faithful Jolly Hog back at...The Stoop). The awful beer. The total lack of atmosphere. The horrendous crowds afterwards. The soulless bowl of Twickenham. The cold toilets (nice and warm in the Members' Bar toilets, ZBMB and all). The flim flam. Being miles away from the action. The everything, frankly.

We were lucky to get a bonus point. Still, happy, happy, joy, joy! We'd better beat Leeds convincingly.

Bookmark or share this story with:

The Good & The Bad: Quins v Wasps
Discussion started by ComeAllWithin.co.uk , 29/12/2009 17:33
ComeAllWithin.co.uk
29/12/2009 17:33
What do you think? You can have your say by posting below.
If you do not already have an account Click here to Register.

The Prof
29/12/2009 17:42
I'm not sure why people are having a go about the eagle, I thought it was fantastic

stickfloat
29/12/2009 18:14
Had the game been mid day and in day light I don't think there would have been a problem with the bird.Flood lights or not they are not noctural flyers.

The Prof
29/12/2009 18:34
What did the bird do wrong, it flew from one side of the ground to the other then into the centre of the pitch with the ball - looked good to me

PerryGo
29/12/2009 18:38
It was not supposed to stop on its flight to eat a small boy in the South Stand ... had the Quins' staff in apoplexy waiting for the law suit ...

Quinten Poulsen
29/12/2009 18:50
But the bird flew to another handler, so while it may not have been planned at least it wasn't a case of the bird landing on someone's barnet.

Quinky Kin
29/12/2009 20:16
One more bad: the ending. It somehow managed to become a nail-biting finish. We had possession, and seconds on the clock, so had to keep the ball alive. It goes to a ruck, and a Wasps player flies in from the side... I'm think "penalty!" but dear Mr. Pearson thinks "advantage Wasps" (not for the first time)...

In all probability we wouldn't have scored, but I'm sure I wasn't the only one hoping for another Stade moment. No chance, not with that ref.

Jammy Git
29/12/2009 20:20
For Twickenham the atmosphere was pretty good. You're having a laugh if you think the Stoop would've been much better for atmosphere given the quality of play.

And you can't complain about the atmosphere and then whine about the X-Factor guy - he got the crowd going way more than any of our players managed.

rodders1
29/12/2009 22:32
BRM what are you doing - you are qualifying as a QGOM more than any one else.
'The Bad' makes me not so ill - and I still feel like C R A P !!
You found significantly more BAD than GOOD, which seems correct.
As a TV pundit it was a disappointing result and our unforced error rate cost us dearly.
Looking at the generalities of our performance, the loss was more down to our errors, than down to their stunning intelligent game plan.
Wasps had some great individual moments but the net result was down to us - on balance Stretts cancelled out his personal error, Cips missed more kicks than we did so the one point margin was a little generous to us on the day.
We were pinged a bit more, but were not made to pay because Cips was way off and should not have started.
The one point was probably about right but had we implemented our game plan? accuratly we could have won.
The disappointment is that we still seem to be 'work in progress', which after last year is a step back ( IMHO )
Conclusion, WIP but we need to get it sorted pronto, the squad is good enough, the team is good enough, we are no longer carrying injuries, but we have the 6 nations looming.
Time to settle down lads and earn your corn.
Stretts was the best example last week - dont take any thing for granted.
for me that was the biggest difference between us. Wasps chased every thing down, we let them - was it over confidence ?
If so get the worry beads out !

on on quins

HarTley Quin
30/12/2009 13:46
One other bad thing - the parking or lack therof. I had to park nearly 20 mns walk away and only just made it for kick off.

I agree about squandering home advantage and hope we don't repeat this next year. However spme of our play was so poor it wouldn't have mattered where we had played!

I'm really disappointed in Quins this year we seem to have gone back a long way. I was used to us being rubbish but, having had a season of being quite good, going back to being cr*p is quite hard to take.

quin up
30/12/2009 15:22
bad selection, percival should of started andress should of started, lambert is not up to the job, and guest instead of skinner who trys hard but is too small. i feel sorry for the boys working their asses off. with light weight second rows and a poor tighthead. dont get me started about the backs that cant bloody catch.
all that pomp of the big game is a joke get your rugby sorted first its not good enough

rodders1
30/12/2009 17:34
... but peo rugby is tough - they need the money, whether we like it or not - and Mark has been very good at driving the money machine.
I, like you, put the rugby first but without the money a pro club has nothing.

on on quins

raedarius
30/12/2009 18:05
"for me that was the biggest difference between us. Wasps chased every thing down, we let them - was it over confidence ?"

That was one of the main bad points of the game for me. Some of the forwards were pretty slow to get to where the action was compared with their Wasps equivalents, leaving our backs to do a lot of rucking.

The other main 'bad' for me - Martin Johnson has broken Ugo.

RossM
31/12/2009 05:12
Martin Johnson has broken Ugo.

Yeah, the England coaching set up seem to manage to do that with horrible regularity.

At Wasps, we remember Mark van Gisbergen coming back mentally in pieces. He's only just getting his old form back.

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment. We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals. We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards. If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing abuse@sportnetwork.net