Down to the Rosebowl for a pivotal Championship game - our 'game in hand'. Over 20 points is a must as long as the weather gives us the opportunity. Questions about Ben Phillips, Peter Trego and Steffan Jones leave the make-up of the side uncertain but whoever plays needs to give us a top perfromance.
v Hampshire LVCC1 @ The Rosebowl Tuesday 20 August 2008
Rain has delayed the start of this game. A game we need to take a whole bunch of points in and gain revenge for our one day defeat on Sunday. There is no team information on the official site or Cricinfo at the present moment but we have most of it I would imagine.
Trescothick, Edwards(?), Langer, de Bruyn, Hildreth, Blackwell, Kieswetter, ?,?,Caddick, Willoughby
The question marks stand by Niel Edwards although I would expect him to play. The real question is which of our second line of seam attack will play? We have two places and FOUR bowlers fighting for a place. Peter Trego is not playing one day games, BenPhillips seems to be carrying some sort of 'niggle', Steffan Jones is pushing through agressive batting and pacy bowling but can be expensive and AlfonsoThomas is doing very little wrong in any format. It is doubtful that we will see second spinning options so I would expect the choice to be between these four men.
But you never know....the mind of Justin is a very complex little place!
We do get started in the afternoon and we don't have our captain.
Marcus Trescothick, no Edwards, Zander de Bruyn (opening?), James Hildreth, Ian Blackwell, Peter Trego, Arul Suppiah, Craig Kieswetter, Alfonso Thomas, Wes Durston, Andrew Caddick, Charl Willoughby
Strange n'est pas? We aren't batting because Hampshire won the toss and decided to bat. No idea what the order will be at the moment but we have them at 112 for 4 with 2 wickets each for Willow and Trigger.
There was little more play on the first day but some excellent bowling from our whole attack with no-one going for more than 3 an over and wickets to the two above. Brilliant figures from Thomas - 7 overs for 9 and the pick of the bowlers was Peter Trego with 2 for 18 off his 7. Ian Blackwell weighed in with 17 off his 11 at 1.5 per over - that's what he can do Mr Langer!
Day 2
We ended the day with Hampshire on 113/4 and Lumb dangerously on 49 (but Carberry has gone at least - he loves us!!). The rain delayed the start and shortened the day but we seem to be away on time on day 2. Caddick and Willoughby are starting the session but it will probably be another 'stop/start' day as the rain clouds are whirling around the bottom half of the country. Rain affected Day 2 but we did get the game moving for at least part of the day.
Ian Blackwell took 'first blood' on Day 2 with the wicket of Dawson at 146. Then Caddick got the big scalp of Lumb but it took another 80 runs in partnership Ervine and the man passed his century before he was caught behind for 107. Mascarenhas put on 41 but each of our men came up with one as the home side lost all their remaining wickets for another 90 thanks to Thomas, Caddick, Blackwell and Willoughby. All out for 316 but it took most of the day and although Marcus and (surprisingly) Arul Suppiah faced a number of overs at the end of the day. It was really a start and then start again. They didn't lose a wicket and amassed 41 by the end of play. Big batting day tomorrow!!
Day 3
Batting the day out and some big scores were what we wanted, so losing Suppiah with only 14 added and then unusually losing de Bruyn cheaply (0!) on the same score was NOT what was required. Hampshire must have been hoping that Tomlinson (who took both - remember him?) was going to have another one of those days against us. However, Hildreth is coming out of his slump to some extent and he settled down to put some runs on with Mr T together they took the score to 142 before Banger went to Dawson.
Wes came in ahead of Ian and got involved in a mix up with Hildreth who was run out as he reached his 50 and his side reched 150 for 4! Bonus points looked a long way off and any kind of result in this even further. Another game for Blackwell to come in and take by the scruff. We've hoped for it all season. He'd bowled well in this game and the Surrey match as well but could he provide the batting strength we needed to put us back in this game and abo ve Notts in the table?
Well first of all he put 47 on with Durston before Wes went LBW to Tahir just before 200. He then put on another 54 with Kieswetter before he went to Tahir caught by Adams. Then he and Trego - the well rested duo - moved into another gear and moved the score to 339 before Trigger went to - you've guessed it - Tahir LBW for an excellent 58 off 51 balls! We ended the day on 385 for 7 with Ian unbeaten on 104 (100 off 168 balls 9 fours and 1 six) keeping up the move to 400 with Alfonso Thomas
Day 4
400 first, then smack it about Ian and then declare, get them in and try and bowl them out. 12 points for certain but more if possible.
Somerset went past 400 quickly before Mr Blackwell went for an excellent and important 129 at 423. However, Thomas was seeing the ball well and he took the score on to 436 with Caddick (who managed 1 in the partnership) before he went for really good 43. Charl came in and went to Dimitri first ball and we were done for 436. Now could we get among them well before they passed our total?
West Country hopes must have soared when Trego bowled Adams with only 26 up - but that was it well into the afternoon as Carberry and Lumb pitched anchor and took the score past 100 at less than three an over.
That's the way it stayed up until the declaration by the home side for 196 and the end of the game. But...12 points and we are Championship leaders going around the third bend with the finish in sight. 5 ahead of Notts - Trent Bridge is going to be a HUGE game!!
I suspect we will find the Rose Bowl wicket for the cc match against Hampshire this week somewhat out of its ordinary `low and slow` nature.
Pakistan leg-spinner Imran Tahir looked decidedly ineffectual on Taunton`s resuse of the `dead` Surrey championship wicket for yesterday`s Pro40 match, with figures of 0-47 at an economy rate of above 7 an over.
Yet he has taken 22 championship wickets in just three matches for Hampshire, and like all legspinners will obviously be looking for more bounce at the Rose Bowl tomorrow.
If the weather was `normal` August variety, I would be tempted to play Michael Munday, but with all this rain around feel this will not happen.
In other selections, Hampshire will probably bring back Michael Brown, Sean Ervine, James Tomlinson (not another 10 wickets please!) and Greg Lamb, compared with yesterday`s side. I notice, though, that John Crawley didn`t play yesterday or in the last championship match and wonder whether he is injured.
Yesterday was ludicrous. It as dark by 7, freezing cold with a really chilly breeze. Most peoplle were in fleeces and my mate even suggested popping home (round the corner) to get some gloves at about 4:30!!
If it's anything like that this week then a spinner is a waste of time except as a run saver I'm afraid because they'll get nothing off the pitch.
Let's hope Jones is back in the CC side; he seems more effective than Phillips with both ball and bat and his endless energy lifts the rest of the side.
I'm not sure Ben is well. He seems to be bowling well within himself and fielding in non pressure positions. Jonah was really producing some pace yesterday but he can be costly, though there's no quesation that he gives everything every time he plays.
And he can bat. It isn't luck that gets him scores, he'll straight drive the best if they give him the ball to do it to.
We need that aggression if we aren't going to use Peter as an allrounder.
"Let's hope Jones is back in the CC side; he seems more effective than Phillips with both ball and bat and his endless energy lifts the rest of the side."
Hear, hear, LoL! In view of the clean bill of health that AH gave everyone before the Surrey game, Jonah's non-selection was baffling in the extreme (to me at least.)
Conversely, I feel that Jonah has been a little too expensive in recent one-day games, though, and wonder whether we ought not to rest him for the remaining CC fixtures (a la Caddy)?
As for the Rose Bowl pitch, I don't think it's really a big turner, usually. I think bounce will be difficult for their groundsman to provide, given the November weather. Having said that, a lack of bounce can be very useful for flipper/slider type balls and even the googly for that matter. Let's hope Imran is of the type that mainly only has his stock wrist-spinner, as that would probably be somewhat negated by a lack of bounce.
Giles White, who played briefly for Somerset in the early 1990s and is yet another product of Millfield School, will be in charge of Hampshire for their cc match against us. He takes over from Paul Terry, who announced his resignation as director of cricket last week.
White, who moved to Hampshire in 1994, has been Terry`s No.2.
Tomorrow is not too bad. Thursday and Friday are fine.
The Thursday forecast is in direct contradiction to the BBC one, which threatens 'persistent rain on the south coast.'
Everyone seems to agree that, like last week, Friday will definitely be fine.
Realistically, I think our best chance of a 'good,' outcome is another maximum points draw.
That would put us nine points ahead of Notts from equal games played, with the game at Trent Bridge up next.. In other words, win at Trent Bridge and Notts hopes would be all but ended..
Of course, Durham remain a threat. They're at Sussex this week, where they have an execrable record.
I'm at work about 6 miles away from the Rose Bowl and although it was drizzling, it's now brightened up somewhat. Would expect them to be able to at least make a start soon.
Langer having a fitness test on a pulled back and Munday in the frame because they seem worried about the wicket and Tahir's perfromances on it. Hmmm
The site is making a big thing of us being able to go past the leaders if we gain FOUR points in this game because this is our game in hand. I hope we're expecting a hell of a lot more than FOUR points from this one!!
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:19:13:25:53 by Grockle.
Is the up-shot that Wes AND Arul have replaced Langer and Phillips?
I wonder if that's a case of them picking both of Wes and Arul to try to replace JL's batting?
I hope Arul has not been picked primarily as a second spinner, because that would be a really grave reflection on things a propos Michael Munday, plus I do not believe that Arul is penetrative enough with the ball to take many wickets on anything other than a bunsen burner. And hopefully, given that they won the toss, it isn't that.
Very pleased that Wes has been given a chance.
Not sure who will open though, Arul with Marcus? That means Neil Edwards passed over. Again, the consideration is, presumably, Arul as a slow bowling option in that particular head-to-head for selection?
All very interesting indeed.
We're going to get a little taste of life without Langer, both as captain and as a batsman...
Frome Exile CricInfo has Durston in for Langer with Caddy in charge.
On second thoughts, a more sensible interpretation would be Suppiah for Langer and Durston for Phillips. But I'm still a little surprised that Edwards didn't come in for the Chief.
I believe Andy is the Club's official Vice-Captain, AG.
I also believe it's fairly common practice for players to eschew captaincy responsibilities during their benefit year, so MT's non-leadership may be indicative of nothing more than temporary unavailability.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:19:13:57:15 by Frome Exile.
Their leading run-scorer (and only centurion bar Pietersen and Pothas) is missing for them, so that perhaps cancels out Langer's absence to some extent.
With only Pothas of this XI averaging higher than 33, it could be a good time to play them.
Need to dispose of Lumb quickly, since he is hurrying along. The openers staying in was not too bad because they were going really slowly, but Lumb needs to go.
Well, JL has been making only scant use of Pete in recent weeks, yet Mr Caddick seems very keen on bowling him. And, one imagines, Pete is enjoying himself…
Incidentally, Mr Rose said the other day that Pete;
"Needs to take more wickets to realise his England ambitions."
Well, Pete has now got 22 wickets at less than 22 for the season. And no, he does not have a bad strike rate. Rather, he just hasn't bowled that much. A mis-judgement to a certain extent?
I think so.
Certainly, he usually carries more menace than Ben Phillips, who is, largely, a containing type bowler.
I wonder if Willow is operating in Whitgift mode? That is bowling spin? (just thinking about the comments earlier about how we were worried about the pitch and its bunsen burner potential.)
Must aim to wrap them up for no more than 180 now, with a view to batting once and then trying to force a victory on the final day. (I'm anticipating some more time will be lost to rain during the match.)
I think so, judging by the downpour that happened where I am. However, it only lasted 10 minutes and has now stopped. Considerably brighter now as well. We might get a bit more tonight but I would imagine that the outfield is pretty wet.
And what glorious news! The opener we seem to be without at the Rosebowl made a hundred at the County Ground against Young MCC today - whooppee! I bet he's over the moon with his score.
Last season our first three batsmen, Trescothick, Edwards and Langer, gave us a consistently good start to our innings. Now it seems we need only one of them, which I find somewhat surprising.
I wonder if the powers-that-be consider Neil to be culpable to some degree in the 'mis-hap,' which has befallen him and if the decision to omit him is somehow reflective of this?
One other thought that occurred to me;
We might be expecting a very low scoring game in this one.
If so, the powers that be might have decided that a right/left hand opening combination might have advantages in producing a few stray deliveries early in the piece as bowlers have to adjust their lines?
I guess the other thing at foot may simply be that the powers-that-be appear particularly keen to promote Arul's chances in the team at the moment. Some of us have fears as to what the exact motivation behind that may be. Though it could be a very simple motivation that they increasingly believe that Arul is good enough.
One thing we can be sure of is that neither he nor Wes will keep a fit JL out of the next CC game, so this is a very big match for both men as a maximum of one of them will survive to the next game, assuming JL is fit.
One final thought - perhaps JL's back injury may be opportune in terms of the one-day side? Someone else (not Caddy either) will get a chance to lead and that could be welcome.
Neil`s `mis-hap`, to use your euphemism AG, may well have had an influence on team selection for Southampton - but not in the way you are suggesting.
The matter was concluded at Taunton Deane yesterday, and in such instances, the magistrates can ask for witnesses to be present - although, in reality, they rarely call them at this late stage.
Playing for the Seconds at Taunton yesterday would have allowed NE to be on hand; travelling to Southampton the day before would not.
Well that's a much happier reason for the exclusion CJM.
Ref the leadership AG. Not gonna happen. There is one captain at Somerset and there will be for the next 18 months at least. MT will not be next in line and Caddy will lead when JL can't.
It's a case of getting used to it I'm afraid people. If you want to speculate on captaincy then you are looking towards the 2010 season before there is any kind of planned change. (And it won't be Marcus)
If Langer can't play in any one-day games, I'm not at all sure that Caddick will captain, given that he often misses such games. In such circumstances Trescothick is the more likely candidate in my opinion.
You mis-understood me, Grockle. I simply meant that, if JL is unfit to play in the one-day games coming up, somebody else will have to lead - and that won't be Caddy unless we're suddenly going to pick him because he's the captain?
Moreover, if JL's back is a little bit dodgy but not terminally so, it would seem to make little sense to risk him in the remaining one-day games?
What I meant is that we, the fans, will get a chance to look at somebody else lead the one-day team (if JL is unfit.) Of course, by definition, Mr Rose and the cricket committee would get the same thing.
re: the earlier one day debate I would also like to point out that, theoretically, Justin Langer will NOT be available for next year's FPT Trophy games, either. This is because he is supposed to be in India with the IPL.*
*In reality, I do not expect Justin to be more successful than the likes of Ricky Ponting of Jacques Kallis in that league. Those latter two, along with Rahul Dravid, were regarded as high-profile (and cost) 'failures,' in the IPL. I can't really see a logical reason to expect JL to be better in the IPL than Kallis or Ponting?
The Times this morning noted that there was "tennis ball" bounce yesterday. Given that Blackie and Arul appear to be bowling in tandem at the moment, could we rue the decision not to include our Leggie?
I've a feeling that this game may well be an epic struggle on a pitch on which it seems to be very possible to stay in but a good deal more difficult to score.
Regrettably, that's probably the kind of pitch that is made for Mr Langer and his adhesive qualities.
On the other hand, on very slow pitches players who rely on timing tend to be neutralised. Those that can bring brute force to bear when necessary have a greater chance of being able to score at a reasonable rate. Paging Mr Blackwell...
btw.. Blub.. the term tennis ball bounce is usually employed to describe a slow, looping type of bounce as opposed to, say, the kind of steepling bounce that one would expect someone like Andrew Caddick to extract from a cricket pitch with a hard ball.
That type of bounce is not necessarily massively helpful to a spinner, either, if the slowness means that batsmen can adjust to the bounce.
Speaking of hard balls, I believe a new ball must be due soon. We really must push through the rest of this line-up. I think our chances of a win depend, substantially, on only batting once.
LoL - I'm not saying MT will not captain on the odd occasion if JL can't play in a one dayer (and I'm not even certain he'll accept it then) but Marcus will not take the captaincy on anything but a one off basis under any circumstances.
Hildreth? Trego? If it's home grown but I think we may see Somerset gong outside the county again after JL. The plan of an 80%/90% home grown youth side coming through seems to have been thrown out as we've neared the top of the Championship.
I suppose a small county with limited finance may have to use the offer of captaincy as a sweetener to get the big name player to come to Taunton. Depends on how funding changes of course.
Grockle: I agree entirely with your first paragraph, but I hope (and I suspect that you too hope) that we shall not be looking elsewhere for a captain after Langer finishes.
Well done lads,a great bowling performance.
Lovely to see Blackie having a good old bowl and doing well too.
Welcome back Ian,let's get those batting points now.
It is difficult to equate this `welcome back Blackie` and `good to see Blackie having a good bowl` line on this thread with the actual facts of the 2008 championship to date.
He has played in all 12 matches, bowled 292 overs before the current game and taken 17 wickets at an average of 40.
Only Willow has bowled more overs at 350, and Ben Phillips in third place is 85 overs behind Blackie. Even in the last match, our man bowled 24 of the 123 overs in the Surrey innings, with only Andy C ahead of him.
It strikes me that this adds up to pretty much `a good bowl` in most people`s terms.
I'm sorry you seem to have misunderstood my post CjM.
I'd have said the same had it been of any bowler who had been out of sorts and searching for form.
Nothing hidden in my meaning,just a case of welcome back to form old bean.
Anything wrong with that?
With 2 days gone we are in a sort of Surrey situation except that Hants don't have Ramprakash.and the weather sounds no better. Realistically all we hope for is a 12 point draw with an outside chance of a win. If we get a full day today then at 4 an over we would end up at 420. It seems to be a 400 and declare job, but then the Notts and Durham games are really win but don't lose games.
I don't agree with the implied suggestion that Ian has somehow bowled economically because JL isn't out there leading the side. Ian habitually bowls with very good economy. I saw him bowl in a very similar vein at Horsham.
I don't see that implied anywhere AG.
If we can't welcome a much respected player back to form then that really is a sad day for the fan off the bank.
Chill out lads and lasses,nothing sinister meant from me.
And always remember,just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they're not after you.
I'm not at all convinced that, in terms of first-class cricket, Ian has been out of form with the ball, Jim. Certainly, he was not even remotely out of form at Horsham and Grockle has suggested that Ian bowled very well against Surrey too.
This was the best form he's shown in a long time AG,it is good to see him bowling so well again.
Are we going to have this sort of debate every time somebody congratulates a player?
Much more important matters at hand.
Let's not split hairs to try and prove a point.
Dawson was a pain in the neck in the one-day game, too, succeeding where Imran had failed. Perhaps he is destined to be a cricketer of some substance..?
Does anyone know what time they went off for lunch? (I'm tryign to calculate the time at which things will re-start.)
Tomorrow's forecast is promising, all of a sudden, so if we could get a lead of any substance today, then one never knows what might happen on the final day..
... On the other hand, there should not be enough time left in the game for them to put us under pressure, so I am content with things at the moment.
It was a late lunch but I am not sure how late. Do you know when they went off, SP?
I think Jim posted at 31 minutes past one to say that Banger was out, so I assume that had only just happened. In which case, they might not be back on until 2:20pm?
A text from a Hampshire-supporting friend at the game
"Suppiah got triggered - lbw to one that pitched outside leg, de Bruyn chopped on and Trescothick top-edged a slog-sweep after having broken short leg's helmet earlier on. Hildreth looks very good"
A text from a Hampshire-supporting friend at the game
1) Suppiah triggered to one that pitched outside leg
2) De Bruyn chopped on
3) Banger top-edged a slogsweep after earlier breaking short leg's helmet
4) Hildreth looks very very good
We continued the trend from Horsham of losing apparently set batsmen right on the cusp of an interval. Hopefully there will be no further such dismissals in this one..
nine, LoL, I meant nine (I'm counting the points already won and a minimum outcome of a drawn match.)
And, yes, the interval business has struck again. Can it just be chance - or is it a lack of concentration? Of the past six first innings intervals on the road - five (all but the close of play yesterday) have a wicket to their name.
If you look at the timing of my previous post, AG, you will note that I was responding to your earlier post about our having secured one so far. I agree that nine are probably guaranteed, but I hope we press on for maximum batting points now, just in case we slip up in our second innings.
Given their predicament in the table, it's conceivable that Hants might take a very negative approach to their 2nd innings, which could work in our favour.
Well... I don't know about you chaps but I would say that SCCC would have NO CHANCE of winning this game, but for the combined contributions of Ian and Pete.
Over to you, Mr Rose, to address the selectorial calumny that you have visited on these two gentlemen...
Pete yet again proving to all concerned that he is a "genuine all rounder" who should NOT be batting at 8.
I really think that Somerset would benefit more if he was in the top 6 at least.
In fairness bo, I think that with this team, any number of players could bat at 5,6,7 or 8. Personally I find it quite reassuring that bobo comes in at 8 as he seems a little more consistent than the others at the moment - and it must really annoy the opposition to see him there!
Well, wherever he bats, he has yet again put in a first class performance, now sadly over.
I must remember to ask my chum BJ if he'd like a discussion about the failure of those who score fifty to go on to three figures, as obviously nobody else would be interested.
Now I suggest IDB ensures we get that fourth batting point and then has a real blitz - but he doesn't need any advice from me.
LoL
Sixty-six Seasons a Somerset Supporter
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:21:17:53:48 by Loyal of Lhasa..
Pete said in the paper last week that he was dissapointed that he has not got to 3 figures this year,but i suppose we will take our number 8 getting 50+ each game!!
Hope Blackie gets the hundred he deserves.
I always struggle with the notion of "deserving" to bat higher.
It doesn't make sense to me.
In this case, someone averaging over 50, and scoring at a run a ball would seem ideal to come in late in the order. Unless those ahead of him are struggling for form*, and I am not sure that is the case.
I just think that pete is simply a better player than a couple of the guys in the top 6 at the moment and has proven that over the past 2 seasons.
I appreciate that a lot of his runs have been at 7/8 but surely its time to put faith in both of his abilities.
Averages dont lie,and people during and at the end of their carrer will always look at that and define weather that player was a nearly man or a good county pro.
What a brilliant performance,well done lads.
Great knock by Blackie,I daren't be too gushing in my praise,and another pointer for the England selectors in the shape of Trigger.
How much does the lad have to do before they recognise his talent?
Full steam ahead now and let's try and force a result.
They'll be there for the taking second time up I reckon.
Absolutely tremendous performance in what must have been a very pressured situation.
Really chuffed for both of them & hope that certain of the 'powers that be' have been watching. They both had points to prove re the lunacy that has been our recent one day selection policy, and have done so in the best possible manner.
Hopefully JL will be the first to congratulate them !
I don't disagree with you bo with regards to Pete's batting. My point is - or rather its more of a question to anyone cleverer than me is - why would this mean that he should bat higher than 8?
Granted, if he was behind someone like Thomas, or Caddy, I could understand it, but does it really matter if he bats behind Wes and Craig? Both are good batters - on their day - and the fact that Pete is more consistent, or at least, in better form makes little difference. To me - at least, he is no less valuable for it, more so imho.
Anyway, it could be viewed as an interesting comparison with the Hampshire skipper who seems to be a place (at least) ahead of Pete in the England pecking order.
Very well done Blackie.
Do they declare overnight or go in for a swish for an hour tomorrow?
Good to see that we didn`t throw away wickets by having a wild dash for 400 before the end of play today.
Surely the tactic now is not just to reach 400 tomorrow, but race past it for, say, 14 overs. By that time we should be around 140 ahead, with 80 overs still left to bowl in the day.
If we can then rush them out in 60-65 overs, the match could be there for the taking.
What a great team performance - makes one very proud. Can anyone say what the score at lunch and tea was? I have the impression we scored increasingly quickly from one session to the next.
What a hero,what a man.
Ian Blackwell,a legend.
Well done Blackie,great to see.
Can this man be left out when in this form?
Perhaps a bit of psychology has done the trick.
Who knows?
Fantastic performance today boys,well done.
Finish them off tomorrow and keep that foot on the gas for the rest of the season.
Impressive.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:21:18:51:22 by Big Jim.
I think it will take a combination of a brisk start tomorrow morning, some cooperative weather and a batting collapse from Hampshire to contrive the win. At least the worst case scenario here is a draw with maximum bonus points. Still puts Durham in the strongest position, but given the weather's behaviour not a bad return.
Congrats to Hilders, PT and above all Blackie for scoring heavily in what sounds like less than optimal conditions.
Yeah; great effort all round, lads, but obviously particularly well done to Blackie for really cashing in.
In answer to LoL's question, wasn't Hildreth out immediately after lunch, which would mean the lunch score was around 150. And wasn't tea taken at the fall of Kieswetter's wicket, on 251?
- Somerset enjoyed a good six hours and effectively shut Hampshire out of the match, going into the final day. Ian Blackwell hit a responsible rather than devastating century, and was backed by his team-mates all the way down the order. It remains to be seen whether the bowlers can do their bit to win the match on the final day - and if the weather will let them
A splendid day thanks to Blackie and Pete. The best thing was Blackie's strike rate which indicated the innings of a batsman in difficult circumstances. I;ve just read what I wrote and Ia m not meaning to criticise Pete as a non batsman because of his strike rate, merely pointing to a different Blackie. I see Hurry is quoted as looking for a lead of 150 so he's asking for another 90 and then bowl like demons. Victory is unlikely but a good 12 points coming
Look, Ian and Pete did what any one that posseses a brain expected them to do. I, personally, was absolutely delighted with what they did. They took four wickets. They were very parismonious and they made more than 150 runs.
I make no apologies whatsoever for calling out Justin Langer and Brian Rose and saying to them - BEHOLLD - without these two we would, almost certainly, have no chance of winning this game.
No one deserves to win the CC title more than A R Caddick - no one on the whole circuit, but I personally cannot wait to see Ian life the trophy above his head and for the powers that be to recant in front of us all. And recant they must.
I hope more than anything we win the CC.
I then hope we lift the trophy as one,as a team.A squad.
No splits,no bad feeling and no one individual feeling any more or any less worthy than anybody else.
The effort they've all put in over the last few seasons has been heart warming.
Let's hope they can make the final push and bring home the title we've all been waiting for.
We're in a decent position, Jim. And Durham have just been undermined by Harmy's ODI return. Suspect they'll win their remaining home games (but find them low scoring) but Durham do struggle, at times, away from home.
Notts?
If we beat them at Trent Bridge, I believe they will be floating on the water...
More than anything, I'm looking forward to North Marine Road. Great ground. Great pitch. More often that not, folk with whom we can get along very well..
Personally i think this is going to be the most important day of the season.
A lead of 69 hopefully will be increased to 125/150 and then let our bowlers put maximum pressure on the hampshire top order.
As we have seen over the years its not a great position to be in as a batting side when the only result you can get is a draw and that is surely the position hampshire are in.
I have heard that the wicket is taking turn and also the "odd" ball is going up or down......... enter Mr Caddidck.
I can see a small run chase late on in the day!!!
Or do we pull out at 400 and get them in asap?
I would have thought that we'd have to back ourselves to bowl them out in two sessions plus a short dart before lunch, wouldn't we?
So my instinct would be to get what we can out of these last three wickets. 100-120 more in an hour and a half?
Times describes it as a slow turner which is what I had guessed was the case from actual match events.
Of course, a draw has to be favoured - especially as there may be showers around, too.
But Mr Trego made a very good point that it can be tough batting when you have no chance of winning which is the situation that should face Hants at some time today.
Being that Hants are desperate for points, and have no chance of winning this game, surely their only option is to shut up shop completely and just aim to survive? If we win this game, we deserve the CC, but I'm not sure we can take 10 wickets today.
But in all honesty their opening attack in this match, Tomlinson and Mascarhenas, are no better than our change bowlers in this match, Thomas and Trego.
I don't think we should underestimate what a good effort this is from Alfonso, too.
He's just gone past his CC best for us, and what a time to do it!
Now show us what your really capable of with the bat, Alfie!
My apologies, Professor. I think my normal standards are slipping as I'm de-mob happy with Bank Holiday coming up, SCCC on the box tomorrow. A trip to Taunton for Thursday night's game, a week in Avignon and, hopefully a trip to Scarborough, all lying in my immediate future.
My only regret is that SCCC cannot play Notts in Avignon where, I'm sure, the weather will be a good deal more reliable.
Don't worry folks. I have to pop out in the car later for 20 minutes or so. As long as I don't go during lunch, that should be good for a couple of wickets!
Trigger is already a legend.
If he's not recognised by the selectors soon with a call up to the national side then I think we need an answer from the men in charge as to why not.
He is the best allrounder in the country and has been for a few seasons.
Stop ignoring him.
As much as I'd hate to see him play less for us the lad deserves his chance.
Go get 'em Trig.
The most obvious being that his off breaks offer greater contrast with Ian's slow left arm.
And Arul then took over from Ian anyway. There's an element of try anything at this stage.
The contrast thing depends on how you look at it, FE. When I've seen Wes, he's generally flighted the ball, as does Ian. Arul tends to bowl darts, though. Therefore, unless the ball is turning a lot, then Wes might be more 'samey,' than Arul?
Regardless, it now seems that they're both being given a chance of a long bowl now - presumably as an audition for which of them will retain his place when JL returns?
I'm not with you?
Are you drawing a parallel between risking key players during the death throes of a drawn game and risking a key test player in ODIs?
Right. I don't think so. We've debunked Vaughan, and as to whether we will lose at home what we gain on tour (with Harmison)? - you may be right; we'll just have to wait and see.
I think the fact that Wes and Arul have continued after tea is the final indication that we've given this game up, and suggests that it would be pretty unfair to consider bowling under such circumstances as any kind of meaningful audition.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008:08:22:16:10:37 by Frome Exile.
Another glance at the table show that, if Kent duly complete victory iover Lancs, we will be top, not by virtue of most wins, but more by virtue of being the only team in the division to have suffered only one defeat.
Does this bear out the oft-quoted adage that the most significant requirement in winning the Championship is to avoid defeat?
I think avoiding defeat saves you from getting relegated, but probably won't be enough to win you the championship (unless weather plays in big part in stopping others getting points while you are lucky and keep getting 12 per match).
Yeah; obviously Durham's five wins to our three leaves them in the box seat at the moment. But I think I'm right in saying that there have been quite a few cases in recent years of the Championship being won by a team other than the one with most wins?
Anyway, let's see what Durham's and Notts' games next week bring and then get ready to stuff them both.
I notice Hants are hosting Durham at an out-ground (Basingstoke) next week which might suggest a less than perfect pitch? Or one that might not cope well with inclement weather? What price a low-scoring shoot-out?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
We record all IP addresses on the Sportnetwork message boards which may be required by the authorities in case of defamatory or abusive comment.
We seek to monitor the Message Boards at regular intervals.
We do not associate Sportnetwork with any of the comments and do not take responsibility for any statements or opinions expressed on the Message Boards.
If you have any cause for concern over any material posted here please let us know as soon as possible by e-mailing
abuse@sportnetwork.net