By Peter Holmes
December 29 2005
Fantasy football brings out the manager in all of us. I loved nothing better than to see how my team was performing against the rest of the punters, how many points my players scored each weekend to send them up or down the fantasy league.
Fun but it echoes real life and as fans we all play out little scenarios in our minds constantly dreaming of this player and that player pulling on the scarlet red of Boro.
We all like to compare players of this generation to players of yesteryear. Generally it's good fun and we all have our own opinion of who and what we like. We tend to pick players we enjoy watching, blokes who entertain us, lads who get stuck in, basically having footballing attributes that we find attractive, as well as the usual skill, pace, power, goal-scoring ability. It's subjective and very rarely do we pick these players out purely on something like the Opta ratings on pure comparative figures alone. Although some of my Sis' faves are there because they have a nice butt.
Yet perversely we generally judge the coach of a team on their performance in figurative terms. That's because they are judged on their end product, which in the rawest sense is position on the ladder, won, drew and lost.
Yes I know there's more to it than that and I'm not going to simplify an issue that has many variables but the game beggars comparisons at every level and just lately one question has been gnawing away inside the festering gunge between my lugs. Who is the better manager, Bryan Robson or Steve McClaren?
Now in terms of success by dint of that historical epoch making Carling Cup triumph - get in you bloody beauty - surely makes Steve McClaren the best coach Boro have ever had? Not on yer Nelly Chor!
As in the minds of the Boro diehards McClaren would not lace the spare boots of one Jack Charlton, never mind Bruce Rioch. Robson himself, the designer and engineer of the giant Boro Yo-Yo drove the team coach to Wembley on three different occasions and but for some of that intangible medium, luck, would have been a silverware legend at the Riverside instead of his present status of failure. So how do I form a comparison between the two, what yardstick do I use?
What else, figures, specifically the performance of the team under the tutelage of Messer's Robson and McClaren while playing in the Premier League.
So, I have been doing a smidgeon of comparative detective work with the Boro's records and to make the ledger balanced I included only the seasons in the top flight, the Premier league and didn't include any of the various cup games.
Now I know that clever manipulation of numbers, statistics, records and the like can make the end product basically say what the spin doctor wants, but you'll get non of that slight of maths here because I'm too bloody thick to count past ten for a start. Besides I've just spent the last few hours trying to work out the bairns i-Pods and being tut-tutted at by an eight-year old software professor and a twelve year-old braniac rolling her eyes muttering about wether I attended skool. So, I've got no high falutin illusions about my mathematical ability.
Figures presented in black and white, stark, informative, what really happened, the truth then. But they don't show the heartache, the highs, the euphoria, screaming near misses, the bad luck, how good the football was and Juninho in full flight or Mendieta ripping Manchester United apart to the tune of 4-1.
So it's amazing how close the comparative records of the two men are when at the helm of Middlesbrough Football Club in the top flight. Yes I know that Robbo got a decent helping hand off El Tel in his final season but Macca gets a helping hand when on England duty as the club does not run on auto-pilot. So here they are, have a squiz, and no I didn't get a calculator for Chrimbo!
Overall record first shown as totals of P W D L F A and PTS, followed by an averaged season using those figures expressed over thirty eight games:
ROBBO;
Seasons 95-96, 96-97 (three cup finals and relegation), 98-99, 99-2000, 2000-2001.
| P | W | D | L | F | A | Pts | |
| Total | 190 | 56 | 62 | 75 | 224 | 260 | 227 |
| Average | 38 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 45 | 52 | 45 |
| P | W | D | L | F | A | Pts | |
| Total | 170 | 57 | 46 | 67 | 203 | 217 | 217 |
| Average | 38 | 12 | 11 | 15 | 45 | 48 | 47 |
