By David Sindall
February 10 2025
Last week our Chairman put out a statement explaining that Nigel Adkins would remain as manager. Apparently our perception that changing managers mid season will improve results is a misguided one. It seems that every club that does this is wrong. We are foolishly indulgent to think otherwise.
I have read Mark Palios’ words many times and each time I am left with a sense of despair. ‘In Nigel’s case, we have a manager with huge experience, a track record of many successes in his career, and a genuine passion for a club he has supported all his life’. It’s worth looking at the evidence behind that statement.
Nigel Adkins may have huge experience but that doesn’t justify his retention. Week in week out we see a team that is struggling, team selections that lack coherency and team tactics that make little sense. Quite how this huge experience is being applied to the massive disaster that is taking place is shrouded in mystery. He took Reading down from the Premier League to the Championship . He has flirted with disaster elsewhere. Aside to Southampton, he is rarely mentioned in affectionate terms.
Then there is the ‘track record of many successes’. Adkins has managed at Bangor City, Scunthorpe Utd, Southampton, Reading, Sheffield Utd, Hull City, Charlton Athletic and now Tranmere. Only his period at Scunthorpe can be deemed a success. He was there for 4 years and was successful. However, this was 15 years ago. He has never repeated the early success. In his other jobs he has repeated a pattern that has emerged at Rovers, early success followed by failure. He left Charlton in October 2021. Two years later he joined Rovers. A manager of such vast experience was not snapped up by any other club until he joined Rovers. Given his many success it seems odd he was out of the game for so long, but maybe his ‘achievements’ with our club offer evidence as to why this is?
We were also told that Nigel has ‘a passion for a club he has supported all his life’. Most home matches you will find about 80% of the crowd are the same. Passionate people who have supported Rovers all their lives. That’s not a qualification for being a manager of anything other than a pub team. Yet the words of our chairman are all that matters.
‘I cannot see what is to be gained by gambling on a less experienced/successful manager, with no real connection to the Club and who would be brought in to manage a squad that he has not chosen’ explains Mark. Odd that this didn’t apply to any of the other managers who have been dismissed by the current owners, including Keith Hill sacked before the play offs. Is this a confession of past failure? Or is it an abdication of our Chairman’s responsibility as owner? Worse still what does it mean in practice? Adkins will manage us in the National League and then the National League North? After all he is passionate about the club and vastly experienced. He has more than 2 years on his contract to run.
In my open letter I tried to give Mark Palios the benefit of the doubt. That was a mistake. There can be no doubt. It would seem that Adkins serves Palios well, a yes man, a useful idiot who will run the shop until the new owners take over. The argument for the retention are just a further demonstration of the smoke and mirrors we have become used to. We will sue the Football League,; We dream of taking the club to the Championship; We will build a new stadium; We will establish a golden share. The list is endless.
The club will be sold for 50 pieces of silver. It feels like the Chairman is abusing the trust supporters have placed in him. Nothing is achieved by sticking with a failing manager. We are hurtling towards the National League. A club without a manager capable of changing our situation, a club with a chairman unprepared to act. This is a disaster in which supporters are being treated as fools. We are being failed, treated with contempt.
54321, that’s your club gone.
Quote:LocalHero
Adkins was only a success at Scunthorpe, but was also only a success at Southampton. It feels a little like the argument is coming before the evidence.
He won the league twice with Bangor, so hardly a failure. At Hull he kept them up from a relegation battle and gave them a solid mid-table finish the next season. They've only finished higher once since then, and won't this season.
I'm guessing lots of the people rewriting his career were the same ones calling for him to get the job a few years ago. He hasn't got us to the top of the league like we'd want, but he seems the perfect person to keep until the end of the season.
This feels a lot like the last Brian Little season. He was appointed with big expectations but never got the promotion he was hired for. His last season really showed why it should be his last, but keeping in position when things were going wrong meant we had the experience for the run-in we need. This season feels similar.
Last time we gambled on sacking a manager in the middle of relegation battle was when John McMahon replaced Ronnie Moore. With hindsight (and at the time) that looks crazy. Switching managers doesn't always help.
A lot of a relegation battle is having the right manager who has the experience for the battle they are in. Adkins knows this league, know how to work with low resources and has grinded out results from a similar position.
Look who we are up against:
Mark Hughes at Carlisle - very good in Premiership relegation battles, but only job in the EFL was him failing to get success at Bradford, mostly through having tactics designed for Premiership, not League 2, players. He's only ever been at clubs who have expensive players. He's not a manager I would want in our position.
Derek Adams at Morecombe - A manager whose first experience of a relegation battle was with Ross County last season. He stormed out of the club, saying the players were all rubbish and couldn't handle the pressure. Aside from this, he's always managers clubs in the top half or fighting for promotion. He'd be a good appointment next season, but he's not the manager we need now.
So of the bottom three managers, I'd take Adkins every time for the relegation battle. Let's look at some of the names suggested as replacement:
Aldo - Not managed in 25 years, showed no interest in another club and lost the only relegation battle he was involved in.
Ronnie Moore - Good in relegation battles, but hasn't managed in 9 years, is now a head scout and 72. If he's happy in a job with low pressure, why put him in a highly pressured job.
Steven Naismith - Bookies favourite. Did well last season at Hearts, but sacked after a dreadful start and a new manager has turned them around. Ok, but not grinding results with a losing team.
Wayne Rooney - Bookies second favourite. That says it all in terms of the available options.
You can add in any number of ex-players who haven't managed before. If you look at the options available, I can't see one better than keeping Adkins for the rest of the season. I don't think he's looking like the right choice for next season, but I can't see someone more suited to getting us out of this mess than him.
Quote:LocalHero
Adkins was only a success at Scunthorpe, but was also only a success at Southampton. It feels a little like the argument is coming before the evidence.
He won the league twice with Bangor, so hardly a failure. At Hull he kept them up from a relegation battle and gave them a solid mid-table finish the next season. They've only finished higher once since then, and won't this season.
I'm guessing lots of the people rewriting his career were the same ones calling for him to get the job a few years ago. He hasn't got us to the top of the league like we'd want, but he seems the perfect person to keep until the end of the season.
This feels a lot like the last Brian Little season. He was appointed with big expectations but never got the promotion he was hired for. His last season really showed why it should be his last, but keeping in position when things were going wrong meant we had the experience for the run-in we need. This season feels similar.
Last time we gambled on sacking a manager in the middle of relegation battle was when John McMahon replaced Ronnie Moore. With hindsight (and at the time) that looks crazy. Switching managers doesn't always help.
A lot of a relegation battle is having the right manager who has the experience for the battle they are in. Adkins knows this league, know how to work with low resources and has grinded out results from a similar position.
Look who we are up against:
Mark Hughes at Carlisle - very good in Premiership relegation battles, but only job in the EFL was him failing to get success at Bradford, mostly through having tactics designed for Premiership, not League 2, players. He's only ever been at clubs who have expensive players. He's not a manager I would want in our position.
Derek Adams at Morecombe - A manager whose first experience of a relegation battle was with Ross County last season. He stormed out of the club, saying the players were all rubbish and couldn't handle the pressure. Aside from this, he's always managers clubs in the top half or fighting for promotion. He'd be a good appointment next season, but he's not the manager we need now.
So of the bottom three managers, I'd take Adkins every time for the relegation battle. Let's look at some of the names suggested as replacement:
Aldo - Not managed in 25 years, showed no interest in another club and lost the only relegation battle he was involved in.
Ronnie Moore - Good in relegation battles, but hasn't managed in 9 years, is now a head scout and 72. If he's happy in a job with low pressure, why put him in a highly pressured job.
Steven Naismith - Bookies favourite. Did well last season at Hearts, but sacked after a dreadful start and a new manager has turned them around. Ok, but not grinding results with a losing team.
Wayne Rooney - Bookies second favourite. That says it all in terms of the available options.
You can add in any number of ex-players who haven't managed before. If you look at the options available, I can't see one better than keeping Adkins for the rest of the season. I don't think he's looking like the right choice for next season, but I can't see someone more suited to getting us out of this mess than him.
Quote:Bored rover
I wouldn't mind if he was Bryan Robson but he played about 13 games for a@#$%&Tranmere side he's hardly Pele himself.
Quote:CleeHillRoadROARQuote:Bored rover
I wouldn't mind if he was Bryan Robson but he played about 13 games for a@#$%&Tranmere side he's hardly Pele himself.
286 appearances for Tranmere puts him in the top 30 of all time. And 33 goals. I’m not saying he’s the perfect owner but I do think his motivation has been to sort out the club that he considers his footballing home, or at least to get it into a better state than when he arrived, rather than to make killing out of it.
Quote:CleeHillRoadROAR
Sorry bored I disagree. If his motivation is the good of the club there are numerous reasons that could influence whether or not he sells at any particular moment. But more importantly, I don’t buy the idea that at the age of 60 a guy with the skills and connections that Palios had in 2014 would choose to buy a deeply struggling and underinvested fourth tier football club and have him and his wife spend most of their time and energy for the next decade in the public eye trying to sort it out with the main aim of making money. There are far easier and less risk-laden ways for a guy with those skills and resources to do that. To me it’s far more likely that someone who has already invested 7 years and first team 286 games into a club who also has a rare set of relevant professional skills thinks that he is the man who can turn things
around. He may not have fully succeeded but this is much more likely to be his mindset than angling for pure profit.
Quote:Bored roverQuote:CleeHillRoadROAR
Sorry bored I disagree. If his motivation is the good of the club there are numerous reasons that could influence whether or not he sells at any particular moment. But more importantly, I don’t buy the idea that at the age of 60 a guy with the skills and connections that Palios had in 2014 would choose to buy a deeply struggling and underinvested fourth tier football club and have him and his wife spend most of their time and energy for the next decade in the public eye trying to sort it out with the main aim of making money. There are far easier and less risk-laden ways for a guy with those skills and resources to do that. To me it’s far more likely that someone who has already invested 7 years and first team 286 games into a club who also has a rare set of relevant professional skills thinks that he is the man who can turn things
around. He may not have fully succeeded but this is much more likely to be his mindset than angling for pure profit.
They didn't think they would be here a decade later , the club was for sale the day they bought it as they openly said, they found the club was in a far worse state than thought once they got the keys. Thought it would be "A lick of paint Mr Fawlty" and out the other side.
Quote:shes gone hkr weve signed 2replacements from man utd. Thats unless theyre playing tmrw🤣hong kong rover
For our final 17 games i'd rather have the tea lady running the team than Adkins.
Quote:CleeHillRoadROAR
Sorry bored I disagree. If his motivation is the good of the club there are numerous reasons that could influence whether or not he sells at any particular moment. But more importantly, I don’t buy the idea that at the age of 60 a guy with the skills and connections that Palios had in 2014 would choose to buy a deeply struggling and underinvested fourth tier football club and have him and his wife spend most of their time and energy for the next decade in the public eye trying to sort it out with the main aim of making money. There are far easier and less risk-laden ways for a guy with those skills and resources to do that. To me it’s far more likely that someone who has already invested 7 years and first team 286 games into a club who also has a rare set of relevant professional skills thinks that he is the man who can turn things around. He may not have fully succeeded but this is much more likely to be his mindset than angling for pure profit.
