By PG Tips
January 12 2021
European Professional Club Rugby’s suspension of the Champions and Challenge Cups raises doubts about the completion both of international and domestic seasons. EPCR took the decision after the French Government ruled that it’s clubs should not play cross border fixtures this month. Clearly management of the health risks must take priority, but questions are now raised about completion of schedules in an already crowded season and the risk of player burnout or injury.
The “English variant” is not the only cause of uncertainty. While French authorities are understandably worried about the health risks of the fixtures, they have arranged for domestic Top 14 ties to fill the gap. The Gallagher Premiership by contrast has announced a two week “circuit break” to allow clubs a rest period taking advantage of the imposed pause. "The welfare of everyone involved in Premiership Rugby is crucial to us and this break in the season gives us the chance to hand some much-needed rest to our hard-working players, management, staff and match officials.” The Pro 14 is yet to make a statement, but the logical outcome of the French position could require postponement of the 6 Nations for a second successive year. Given the different positions of the domestic competitions a consensus between the 6 Nations Governments and Unions on continuation, rescheduling or timing of the tournament will not be easy to achieve.
The Lions tour of South Africa is yet another story. With its own Covid 19 variant, South Africa’s health system is struggling to cope, and suggestions have already been made about postponing the tour, or even moving it to British and Irish venues. Either solution has its drawbacks: further pressure on an already congested global calendar or loss of significant revenue to the South African Union and hospitality sector. Whatever form the tour takes, if it survives at all, it almost certainly will not be the July & August trek currently planned.
The French Rugby Union saw an opportunity in EPCRs postponement, bringing forward Top14 matches allowing the season to continue undisturbed and offering clubs flexibility in managing the burden on their players- particularly internationals. English clubs it seems were not unanimous in their wishes. Rob Baxter, Pat Lam and Lee Blackett all publicly called for Premiership fixtures to be brought forward. Reports suggest that the circuit break decision arose because some other clubs failed to back the idea. Squad health and individual clubs’ struggles with managing the virus are the likely reason, but each club will have their own view on whether the break is an opportunity lost or gained.
So what of Bath’s position? The next two Premiership fixtures are Bristol away and Harlequins at home. While a trip to the rampant Bears straight after a home thumping by Wasps may not be appealing, the thought of those matches being brought forward, making internationals available before their absence on 6 Nations camp, surely balances that concern? Usually after a defeat like that both players and coaches are desperate to get back out there and atone. I suspect that Stuart Hooper and his coaches may be more frustrated than relieved by the ruling. What the rest period does provide is an opportunity for honest review by coaches and players of failings to date and much needed hard work to get Bath back on a winning path. When that path opens again and when the next win comes are anybody’s guess. Let us hope – against hope – that it will be 29 January.
Quote:dcsh
Taking on Bristol this weekend with all our internationals could have been exciting and entertaining. In 2 weeks when we a depleted and they are missing very few could be a tough ask.

Quote:dcsh
What do you mean? We will have had 2 weeks of great training! ;-)

Quote:shipwrecked
we did better when we didn't train!
