The
Figures Explained
The
figures are taken from the Zurich
Premiership site and can be verified against those published there. Every effort has been made to verify their accuracy, but
they are subject to error, either my own, or by the administrators of
the Zurich site.
These
figures are based on
all home Zurich games, Premiership, Play-offs, Wild Card and Championship matches.
They do not include any Powergen Cup or
European competition figures, as there are no reliable sources for these.
My
study starts with the 97/98 season, as that is the first for which figures are
on record although openly professional rugby began in England the season before
this. They are based on
the 12 clubs in the Zurich premiership during the 2004/5 season.
Different
ways of counting a crowd
It is apparent that different clubs have different methods of counting crowd numbers.
Some clubs only count numbers through the turnstiles, so they always report a below capacity ground even if it has sold out. Others openly admit to counting tickets sold rather than heads attending – and this means that they count 100% of their season ticket holders for every match, whether or not they attend.
Last season in an attempt to address this, and to assist comparison, I produced some weighted results in addition to the exact published figures. In these weighted results I add an extra 15% to the numbers for those clubs who only count bodies through the turnstiles. Whilst I am keeping watch on this I have decided against repeating the exercise this time around. The difference was marginal both last season and the one prior so made little or no difference to the overall picture.
Crowd % Variance 1997/8 - 2004/5
| London Irish | 183% |
| Sale | 130% |
| Northampton | 82% |
| Newcastle | 58% |
| Gloucester | 57% |
| Wasps | 55% |
| Harlequins | 49% |
| Bath | 43% |
| Leeds | 35% |
| Leicester | 31% |
| Saracens | -18% |

For each club surveyed, as well as the raw figures, I’ve attempted to give a range of figures to assist with comparison. As well as comparative percentage growth there is comparative absolute growth. Thus Leicester, who come 11th in terms of percentage growth the period covered, with a 31% crowd increase (Graph above), come a more respectable 7th in absolute growth, having grown their average crowd by 3,931 in this period (Graph below). Neither graph can be said to be more accurate than the other. They are merely different ways of viewing the same figures.
Crowd Number Variance 1997/8 - 2004/5
| London Irish | 6799 |
| Northampton | 5365 |
| Sale | 4721 |
| Gloucester | 4320 |
| Leicester | 3931 |
| Wasps | 3228 |
| Bath | 3166 |
| Newcastle | 2929 |
| Harlequins | 2909 |
| Leeds | 1431 |
| Saracens | -1711 |

The London Double Header
In terms of compiling the statistics the London Double Header has presented a problem. This was not just to myself but also to the powers that be at Premiership Rugby. They published erroneous figures earlier in the season when they double counted the crowd.
The simple fact is that on the first day of the 04/05 season 51,000 people turned up at Twickenham to watch two games, London Irish against Harlequins and Saracens against Wasps. Whichever way you deal with the figure has downsides. In the end I decided that the fairest thing to do was to divide the crowd in four and allocate 12,750 to each game. As the games were technically 'away' games for Harlequins and Wasps this shows them this season as having twelve home Zurich Premiership games whereas the rest of the teams had eleven. As I have said not perfect but the least of all evils.
Club
by club – my spin on the figures
The
author is a London Irish supporter whose interest was sparked by the growth he
has witnessed at his own club. I have attempted for the purposes of these
articles to remain dispassionate and objective. However, there may be times when
some bias comes through.
For
each club I present the published figures, together with their
relative positions. As a London Irish supporter my knowledge of actions taken by
the club with regards to promotions, price increases, etc. will enable my
interpretation of the figures to be more detailed than that for other clubs. In
preparation for this series of articles I have consulted many other clubs’
supporters. Their assistance and insights have proved invaluable.
There
is an old saying about lies, dammed lies and statistics. No doubt some of my
reading of these figures will be called into question. That I welcome
unreservedly. Other than being an active rugby supporter, an amateur
statistician and having had the time and inclination to gather these figures I
claim no specialist knowledge.
Bookmark or share this story with: