CALLING THE SHOTS
Cricket books written by current players can be
a mixed bag. For every classic like ‘Eight Days a Week’ by Jonathon Agnew, there
are dozens that read like an accountancy exam, devoid of originality. Many fit
somewhere in the middle, with some genuine insight given, but not too much, we have the end of career
biography to think of, mixed in with some hefty padding. ‘Calling the Shots’
by Michael Vaughan falls in the higher end of this middle group.
The book contains plenty of filler: match
descriptions, scorecards, statistics and player pen pics that you could probably
have a stab at writing yourself. But in-between there are enough insights into
The book covers
The most interesting aspect of the book is the
assessment
A chapter towards the middle of the book about
Harmison, Flintoff and Vaughan himself is particularly revealing. Harmison seems
someone who practically needs babysitting when away from home. Description of
gangs of mates coming down to stay with him when he’s strayed as far as London
give you the impression, unintended I’m sure, of the slow kid at school who
could only be trusted with the safety scissors.
Many of the clichés and whining so prevalent in
the genre are avoided. Tales of golf games against former legends, niggles about
facilities on tour, complaints about dips in form, dodgy umpiring decisions, and
press criticism are all kept to a minimum. In fact, it seems that the only time
press flak really annoyed
Indeed, good quality photographs form an
important aspect of this and all sports books. The majority here are on-field action
shots, and whilst they’re excellent - probably the best available to the
publishers – we’ve seen them before many times. What are missing are more
personal glimpses into
Reading the book now, at the end of the dismal
2006/07 Ashes tour, it’s interesting to speculate what influence
The overall impression left is of a highly
intelligent man, who is focused and above all, honest. It would be interesting
to see what some of the TV and Radio commentators make of his views on field
placement, etc. I’ve certainly come away with the impression that out on the
field, without any of the computer analysis available, he’s still capable of
being a good few overs ahead of where the ‘experts’ are in reading the
game.
Bookmark or share this story with: